Accessibility Tools

Skip to main content

TERMINATING EMPLOYEES FOR MEDICAL MARIJUANA STARTING TO RAISE SERIOUS LEGAL ISSUES

Written on .

Federal law still considers marijuana illegal, and it is exempt from positive drug-testing protection under the ADA.  For many years, arbitrators and courts allowed employers to terminate employees who tested positive for marijuana, even in medical marijuana situations.  Since 2017, however, the situation has become more confusing.

Courts in at least four states have indicated that employers potentially violate state law by disciplining employees with positive marijuana tests in the case of medical marijuana.  The first state was Rhode Island in 2017, and now the states have expanded to include Delaware, Connecticut, and Massachusetts.  The number of states in this category could expand further, as some 13 states have anti-discrimination provisions in their laws specifically for medical marijuana patients, and many other states have laws protecting lawful off-duty activities against employer retaliation.  Some 32 states and Washington, D.C., now allow medical marijuana, and some states have legalized recreational use.  There is a question whether the "lawful activities" state statutes affect a worker for failing a positive medical marijuana test, since medical marijuana may not qualify as a lawful activity because it is illegal under federal law.   On the other hand, these state law issues do not appear to be as big a problem when there is federally mandated drug testing, such as the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) requirements of testing for workers who operate commercial vehicles.  Even in DOT testing situations, a plaintiff might argue that it is possible for an employer to test for marijuana and yet allow some sort of accommodation to a medical marijuana user.

The employer community is confused concerning these developments, which are particularly complicated in the case of multi-state employers.  Because of the legal issues as well as a shortage of workers, some companies have discontinued testing for marijuana or only testing employees in safety-sensitive positions, or have provided job accommodations for medical marijuana patients.

Related Content

Get Email Updates

Receive newsletters and alerts directly in your email inbox. Sign up below.

Recent Content

person staning next to someone in a wheelchair, outdoors

"No-Fault" Attendance Policy Upheld against Disability Claims

Employers continue to be confused about how to handle absences related to disabilities, as to applying their "no-fault" attendance polici...
person holding up a hand, stop, indoors

NLRB Issues First Unfair Labor Practice Complaint against Non-Competes and Training Repayment

The General Counsel of the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB), former union lawyer Jennifer Abruzzo, continues to attempt to expand th...
ftc front door

Department of Justice's Anti-trust Division Announces Anti-trust Compliance Programs Include Training for Human Resources

There is relatively recent increased attention from government enforcement authorities of anti-trust issues affecting human resource prof...
stylized ai graphic

AI Hiring Bias Is New Focus of EEOC

The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission's (EEOC) Strategy Enforcement Plan for 2024-2028 published in the Federal Register last year ...
old fashio keys, hanging on a ring, attached to a wood board

Keys to Address Employee Dissatisfaction and Activism

We are in a new age of employee dissatisfaction and activism.  There were critical labor shortages during the pandemic, and increased con...
promo graphic, Procedural Accommodations: Efficiently Handling Employer Obligations

Procedural Accommodations: Efficiently Handling Employer Obligations

The ADA and other legislation – both states as well as federal -- often require “reasonable accommodations” in a multiplicity of settings...