--- title: "Words and Actions: How Employers Should Respond To The Supreme Court Decision on LBGTQ Employment Rights" description: "" url: "https://wimlaw.com/articles/how-employers-respond-scotus-lbgtq-2020" date: "2026-06-22T15:16:47+00:00" language: "en-US" --- # Words and Actions: How Employers Should Respond To The Supreme Court Decision on LBGTQ Employment Rights Written on June 17, 2020. *Tag(s):* [Kathleen J. Jennings](https://wimlaw.com/index.php?option=com_tags&view=tag&id%5B0%5D=8:kathleen-j-jennings) As everyone should be aware, this week, the U.S. Supreme Court held that Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, prohibits covered employers from discriminating against employees or applicants on the grounds of sexual orientation, sexual identity, and transgender status. This is a pretty big deal in the employment law world and presents a new legal compliance issue for many employers in states that do not offer legal protections to LGBTQ workers. Who are covered employers? Generally, they are businesses with 15 or more employees, including part-time and temporary workers. And Title VII is a federal law, so it will apply to covered employers regardless of what state they are in. While many people welcomed the Supreme Court’s decision, a review of social media also reveals that there are those who are very adamantly opposed to it. So what is an employer to do with employees who are opposed to LGBTQ rights in the workplace or simply don’t want to work with LGBTQ co-workers? We start with words: An employer covered by Title VII should review its employment policies and ensure that all Equal Employment and Anti-harassment policies and procedures include sexual orientation, sexual identity, and transgender status as covered characteristics. The company should disseminate the revised policies and procedures to all employees and collect an acknowledgment of receipt of the revised policies from each and every employee. Next, we look at actions: Any and all training on Equal Employment and Anti-harassment policies and procedures should include the newly covered characteristics. That training should emphasize the employer’s lack of tolerance of discrimination or harassment based upon any and all of the protected characteristics listed in its polices and covered by federal, state, or local law. And the most important action is this–if an employer becomes aware that one of its employees is discriminating against or harassing another employee on the basis of any protected characteristic, the employer has a duty to investigate and take prompt, effective, remedial action. That means that if an employee has been making anti-gay slurs, that employee needs to be counseled and disciplined. If an employee refuses to use another employee’s chosen pronouns, the recalcitrant employee needs to counseled and disciplined. What makes this situation more challenging is the “religion factor.” Some folks will assert that homosexuality or using a gender identity or gender expression differs from the one assigned at birth is “against their religion.” In Title VII, there is a certain tension between prohibiting discrimination and requiring religious accommodation. There are pending cases in which the courts must sort out how religious institutions can deal with these issues. However, in a private employment setting, it is highly unlikely that the EEOC and the federal courts are going to interpret Title VII as allowing employees to harass or refuse to work with other employees because they are gay or transgender as a “religious accommodation.” The bottom line is this: if a covered employer wants to avoid liability under Title VII, it simply cannot tolerate anti-gay or anti-trans comments, harassment, or actions in the workplace, as it should not tolerate other forms of discrimination and harassment. Employees must understand that they must treat each other with respect and that there are consequences if they fail to do so. - [](https://x.com/intent/post?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwimlaw.com%2Farticles%2Fhow-employers-respond-scotus-lbgtq-2020.md&text=) - [](https://www.facebook.com/sharer/sharer.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Fwimlaw.com%2Farticles%2Fhow-employers-respond-scotus-lbgtq-2020.md) - [](https://www.linkedin.com/sharing/share-offsite/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwimlaw.com%2Farticles%2Fhow-employers-respond-scotus-lbgtq-2020.md) - [](mailto:?subject=Words%20and%20Actions%3A%20How%20Employers%20Should%20Respond%20To%20The%20Supreme%20Court%20Decision%20on%20LBGTQ%20Employment%20Rights) ![Kathleen J. Jennings](https://wimlaw.com/images/resources/articles/2020/06/kathleen-portrait-300.jpg) Kathleen J. Jennings Former Principal Kathleen J. Jennings is a former principal in the Atlanta office of Wimberly, Lawson, Steckel, Schneider, & Stine, P.C. She defends employers in employment matters, such as sexual harassment, discrimination, Wage and Hour, OSHA, restrictive covenants, and other employment litigation and provides training and counseling to employers in employment matters. ## Related Content [ ![grandma reaching out to hold great grandson](https://wimlaw.com/media/yootheme/cache/81/rod-long-y0OAmd_COUM-unsplash-811d54ec.jpg) ](https://wimlaw.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1277:age-discrimination-workplace&catid=222) ### [E27: Age is More Than a Number-Age Discrimination in the Workplace](https://wimlaw.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1277:age-discrimination-workplace&catid=222) [Podcasts](https://wimlaw.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=category&id=222) [Read more](https://wimlaw.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1277:age-discrimination-workplace&catid=222) [ ![cannabis on a table, indoors](https://wimlaw.com/media/yootheme/cache/f8/wesley-gibbs-NxRx7_mPdEk-unsplash-f84b6c27.jpg) ](https://wimlaw.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1271:workplace-marijuana&catid=222) ### [E26: Weed in the Workplace](https://wimlaw.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1271:workplace-marijuana&catid=222) [Podcasts](https://wimlaw.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=category&id=222) [Read more](https://wimlaw.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1271:workplace-marijuana&catid=222) [ ![box on white table in a white room indoors](https://wimlaw.com/media/yootheme/cache/66/box-kelli-mcclintock-GopRYASfsOc-unsplash-663953ce.jpg) ](https://wimlaw.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1270:ban-box-laws&catid=222) ### [E25: What Are Ban the Box Laws?](https://wimlaw.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1270:ban-box-laws&catid=222) [Podcasts](https://wimlaw.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=category&id=222) [Read more](https://wimlaw.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1270:ban-box-laws&catid=222) ## Get Email Updates Receive newsletters and alerts directly in your email inbox. Sign up below. ## Recent Content [ Articles ](https://wimlaw.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=category&id=205) [ ![ai, human reach out](https://wimlaw.com/media/yootheme/cache/f1/igor-omilaev-FHgWFzDDAOs-unsplash-f12346e8.jpg) ](https://wimlaw.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1582:fcra-litigation-challenges-employers-ai-hiring&catid=53)### [FCRA Litigation Challenges Employers’ Use of AI Hiring Platforms](https://wimlaw.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1582:fcra-litigation-challenges-employers-ai-hiring&catid=53) [Employment Law Newsletter: A Monthly Report On Labor Law Issues](https://wimlaw.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=category&id=53) A January 20, 2026, class action filed against Eightfold AI, Inc. in California is sending shockwaves through the employer and AI community… [Read more](https://wimlaw.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1582:fcra-litigation-challenges-employers-ai-hiring&catid=53) [ ![danger sign, skull](https://wimlaw.com/media/yootheme/cache/01/mikael-seegen-jX6WXNkvsPs-unsplash-01c1ebef.jpg) ](https://wimlaw.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1584:ai-research-discovery-requests-dangers&catid=53)### [The Dangers of Employers Using AI Research Tools as to Discovery Requests from Plaintiffs](https://wimlaw.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1584:ai-research-discovery-requests-dangers&catid=53) [Employment Law Newsletter: A Monthly Report On Labor Law Issues](https://wimlaw.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=category&id=53) A second “bombshell” affecting HR pertaining to AI is a federal court ruling in New York, that a defendant’s use of AI in researching and p… [Read more](https://wimlaw.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1584:ai-research-discovery-requests-dangers&catid=53) [ ![CHAT GPT](https://wimlaw.com/media/yootheme/cache/64/emiliano-vittoriosi-fvxNerA8uk0-unsplash-64a16be4.jpg) ](https://wimlaw.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1585:ai-employer-protection&catid=53)### [Two Subsequent Cases Protect Defendant’s Use of AI as Subject to Work-product Protection](https://wimlaw.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1585:ai-employer-protection&catid=53) [Employment Law Newsletter: A Monthly Report On Labor Law Issues](https://wimlaw.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=category&id=53) Soon after the deciding of the above-discussed case on February 17, 2026, in U.S. v. Heppner, a criminal case in the District Court for the… [Read more](https://wimlaw.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1585:ai-employer-protection&catid=53) [ ![avoid, wave away](https://wimlaw.com/media/yootheme/cache/6f/priscilla-du-preez-NQTphr4Pr60-unsplash-6fb4df83.jpg) ](https://wimlaw.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1586:employer-avoid-waiving-privileges-ai-research&catid=53)### [Is There Anything an Employer Can Do to Avoid Waiving Privileges in Using AI Research Tools?](https://wimlaw.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1586:employer-avoid-waiving-privileges-ai-research&catid=53) [Employment Law Newsletter: A Monthly Report On Labor Law Issues](https://wimlaw.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=category&id=53) There are no easy answers to the above question, but some general observations will nevertheless be made. First, the New York district cou… [Read more](https://wimlaw.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1586:employer-avoid-waiving-privileges-ai-research&catid=53) [ ![ai visualization](https://wimlaw.com/media/yootheme/cache/45/milad-fakurian-5yWtM3M3JKM-unsplash-45306e6d.jpg) ](https://wimlaw.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1587:ai-legal-recommendations&catid=53)### [Suggestions on Use of AI](https://wimlaw.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1587:ai-legal-recommendations&catid=53) [Employment Law Newsletter: A Monthly Report On Labor Law Issues](https://wimlaw.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=category&id=53) Perhaps the starting point is to look at the type of AI platforms generally available. At a recent conference about AI use for HR, speaker… [Read more](https://wimlaw.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1587:ai-legal-recommendations&catid=53) [ ![june 2026 legal immigration webinar promo graphic](https://wimlaw.com/media/yootheme/cache/45/june-2026-webinar-immigration-453d45bc.jpg) ](https://wimlaw.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1583:worksite-enforcement-tps-parole&catid=221)### [Worksite Enforcement and TPS and Parole Status Update](https://wimlaw.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1583:worksite-enforcement-tps-parole&catid=221) [Webinars: Employment Law "Hot Topics"](https://wimlaw.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=category&id=221) The webinar covers how to deal with a worksite enforcement action and various types of immigration enforcement activities. The webinar also… [Read more](https://wimlaw.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1583:worksite-enforcement-tps-parole&catid=221) ### Additional Legal Resources [### Newsletter Explore ](https://wimlaw.com/publications/newsletters) [### Books Explore ](https://wimlaw.com/publications/books) [### Alerts Explore ](https://wimlaw.com/alerts) [### Articles Explore ](https://wimlaw.com/articles) [### Audits Explore ](https://wimlaw.com/audits) [### Events Explore ](https://wimlaw.com/events) ## Schema ```json { "@context": "https://schema.org", "@type": "BreadcrumbList", "itemListElement": [ { "@type": "ListItem", "position": 1, "name": "Home", "item": "https://wimlaw.com" }, { "@type": "ListItem", "position": 2, "name": "Articles", "item": "https://wimlaw.com/articles" }, { "@type": "ListItem", "position": 3, "name": "Words and Actions: How Employers Should Respond To The Supreme Court Decision on LBGTQ Employment Rights", "item": "https://wimlaw.com/articles/how-employers-respond-scotus-lbgtq-2020" } ] } ```