# Religious Accommodation: What is Reasonable? The Tenth Circuit Rejects the EEOC’s Proposed Standard. Written on January 18, 2018. This week, the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals issued a decision in a case that involves workers who cannot work on certain days for religious reasons, and how an employer should go about accommodating such religious practices. The case, *Tabura v. Kellogg USA*, 10th Cir., No. 16-4135 (January 17, 2018), was filed by two Kellogg USA workers, who are Seventh-day Adventists, who said they were fired for not working Saturday shifts. The accommodation offered by Kellogg was a policy that allowed them to swap shifts with other workers. However, Kellogg assessed disciplinary points against any employee who missed part or all of a scheduled work day without taking paid time off or trading shifts with another employee. The plaintiffs were unable to find workers who would swap shifts with them, and eventually, they were terminated for missing too much work. The lower court granted summary judgment in favor of Kellogg, and the Tenth Circuit reversed. The case caught the attention of the EEOC, and the EEOC filed a brief in support of the plaintiffs. In its brief, the EEOC argued that the accommodation offered by Kellogg was not reasonable, and it further argued that to be reasonable, an accommodation must "eliminate" the conflict between the employee's religious practice and his work requirements. The Court rejected the EEOC's proposed rule, finding instead that the question of whether an accommodation is reasonable must be made on a case-by-case basis, grounded on the specific facts presented by a particular situation. The Tenth Circuit remanded the case back to the district court because it was unclear whether Kellogg satisfied its obligation to accommodate the workers' religious practices due to the disputed facts surrounding the difficulty the plaintiffs had in arranging voluntary swaps with other, qualified employees. The takeaway: Title VII requires that an employer, short of undue hardship, make reasonable accommodations to the religious needs of its employees. "Accommodate . . . means . . . allowing the plaintiff to engage in her religious practice despite the employer's normal rules to the contrary." EEOC v. Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc., 135 S. Ct. 2028, 2032 (2015). This is not a "one size fits all" rule. Ultimately, reasonableness is a fact-specific determination. Relevant factors may include the type of workplace, the nature of the employee's duties, the identifiable cost of the accommodation in relation to the size and operating costs of the employer, and the number of employees who will in fact need a particular accommodation. Some common methods of religious accommodation in the workplace include the following: - Scheduling Changes, Voluntary Substitutes, and Shift Swaps - Changing an employee's job tasks or providing a lateral transfer - Making an exception to dress and grooming rules - Use of the work facility for a religious observance - Accommodations relating to payment of union dues or agency fees - Accommodating prayer, proselytizing, and other forms of religious expression Ultimately, the determination of whether and how an employer can accommodate an employee's sincerely held religious beliefs requires the balancing of many factors. We recommend that these decisions be made in consultation with qualified employment counsel. - [](https://x.com/intent/post?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwimlaw.com%2Farticles%2Freligious-accommodation-what-is-reasonable-the-tenth-circuit-rejects-the-eeocs-proposed-standard.md&text=) - [](https://www.facebook.com/sharer/sharer.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Fwimlaw.com%2Farticles%2Freligious-accommodation-what-is-reasonable-the-tenth-circuit-rejects-the-eeocs-proposed-standard.md) - [](https://www.linkedin.com/sharing/share-offsite/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwimlaw.com%2Farticles%2Freligious-accommodation-what-is-reasonable-the-tenth-circuit-rejects-the-eeocs-proposed-standard.md) - [](mailto:?subject=Religious%20Accommodation%3A%20%20What%20is%20Reasonable%3F%20%20The%20Tenth%20Circuit%20Rejects%20the%20EEOC%E2%80%99s%20Proposed%20Standard.) ![Kathleen J. Jennings](https://wimlaw.com/images/resources/articles/2020/06/kathleen-portrait-300.jpg) Kathleen J. Jennings Former Principal Kathleen J. Jennings is a former principal in the Atlanta office of Wimberly, Lawson, Steckel, Schneider, & Stine, P.C. She defends employers in employment matters, such as sexual harassment, discrimination, Wage and Hour, OSHA, restrictive covenants, and other employment litigation and provides training and counseling to employers in employment matters. ## Related Content ## Get Email Updates Receive newsletters and alerts directly in your email inbox. Sign up below. ## Recent Content [ Articles ](https://wimlaw.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=category&id=205) [ ![globe](https://wimlaw.com/media/yootheme/cache/2a/kyle-glenn-nXt5HtLmlgE-unsplash-2a3d008b.jpg) ](https://wimlaw.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1605:termination-tps-status-july-17&catid=52)### [Termination of TPS Status (July 17, 2026) for Haitians, Syrians, Somalians, South Sudanese, Yemeni, Ethiopians, and Burmese](https://wimlaw.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1605:termination-tps-status-july-17&catid=52) [Alerts](https://wimlaw.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=category&id=52) On July 10, 2026, E-Verify notified employers that work authorization is extended temporarily through July 24, 2026, for workers from the f… [Read more](https://wimlaw.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1605:termination-tps-status-july-17&catid=52) [ ![chaotic light lines](https://wimlaw.com/media/yootheme/cache/33/soheb-zaidi-yuv1FPyZdR0-unsplash-33611845.jpg) ](https://wimlaw.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1604:termination-tps-status-july-10-update&catid=52)### [TPS UPDATE! Termination of TPS Status for Haitians, Syrians, Somalians, South Sudanese, Yemeni, Ethiopians, and Burmese](https://wimlaw.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1604:termination-tps-status-july-10-update&catid=52) [Alerts](https://wimlaw.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=category&id=52) On July 10, 2026, E-Verify notified employers that work authorization is extended temporarily through July 24, 2026, for workers from the f… [Read more](https://wimlaw.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1604:termination-tps-status-july-10-update&catid=52) [ ![connected spheres](https://wimlaw.com/media/yootheme/cache/12/d-koi-COFXWa6LJdw-unsplash-12ea6ce5.jpg) ](https://wimlaw.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1598:dol-joint-employer-rule&catid=53)### [DOL Issues New Joint Employer Rule Proposal](https://wimlaw.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1598:dol-joint-employer-rule&catid=53) [Employment Law Newsletter: A Monthly Report On Labor Law Issues](https://wimlaw.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=category&id=53) The U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) announced on April 22, 2026, a new proposed rule clarifying when multiple employers are jointly liable f… [Read more](https://wimlaw.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1598:dol-joint-employer-rule&catid=53) [ ![plaintiff sign](https://wimlaw.com/media/yootheme/cache/89/wesley-tingey-mlGJB5D9IS0-unsplash-898571c2.jpg) ](https://wimlaw.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1599:scotus-drivers-exempt-faa-arbitration&catid=53)### [The Supreme Court Again Addresses Whether Drivers Are Exempt from FAA Arbitration Agreements ](https://wimlaw.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1599:scotus-drivers-exempt-faa-arbitration&catid=53) [Employment Law Newsletter: A Monthly Report On Labor Law Issues](https://wimlaw.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=category&id=53) The Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) encourages the use and enforcement of arbitration agreements, although the Act contains an exception for… [Read more](https://wimlaw.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1599:scotus-drivers-exempt-faa-arbitration&catid=53) [ ![3](https://wimlaw.com/media/yootheme/cache/a0/marcel-eberle-FGYv8CDQBmg-unsplash-a0ece82f.jpg) ](https://wimlaw.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1600:nlrb-member-trump-nominee-change&catid=53)### [Trump Nominates Third NLRB Member, Whose Confirmation Signals Potential for Change ](https://wimlaw.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1600:nlrb-member-trump-nominee-change&catid=53) [Employment Law Newsletter: A Monthly Report On Labor Law Issues](https://wimlaw.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=category&id=53) On April 13, 2026, President Trump nominated James Macy to fill the third vacant Republican seat on the National Labor Relations Board (NLR… [Read more](https://wimlaw.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1600:nlrb-member-trump-nominee-change&catid=53) [ ![deception](https://wimlaw.com/media/yootheme/cache/3e/mick-haupt-2vCvnNhsi6E-unsplash-3e10d265.jpg) ](https://wimlaw.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1601:defendant-sues-plaintiff-fabricated-sex-harassment&catid=53)### [Defendant Sues Plaintiff Over “Fabricated” Sex Harassment Claims](https://wimlaw.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1601:defendant-sues-plaintiff-fabricated-sex-harassment&catid=53) [Employment Law Newsletter: A Monthly Report On Labor Law Issues](https://wimlaw.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=category&id=53) An employer official named in a graphic sexual harassment suit brought a counter-claim against her accuser for defamation, calling his alle… [Read more](https://wimlaw.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1601:defendant-sues-plaintiff-fabricated-sex-harassment&catid=53) ### Additional Legal Resources [### Newsletter Explore ](https://wimlaw.com/publications/newsletters) [### Books Explore ](https://wimlaw.com/publications/books) [### Alerts Explore ](https://wimlaw.com/alerts) [### Articles Explore ](https://wimlaw.com/articles) [### Audits Explore ](https://wimlaw.com/audits) [### Events Explore ](https://wimlaw.com/events)