---
title: "Concerted Protections for Individual Job Actions Expanded by NLRB"
description: "Explore NLRB's expanded 'concerted' protections for workers, emphasizing group actions. Stay updated on evolving labor laws and employee safeguards."
url: "https://wimlaw.com/publications/newsletters/nlrb-concerted-protections-individual-job-actions"
date: "2026-06-03T02:07:19+00:00"
language: "en-US"
---

#  NLRB Expands "Concerted" Protections for Individual Job Actions

Written on October 19, 2023.

*Tag(s):* [NLRB (National Labor Relations Board)](https://wimlaw.com/index.php?option=com_tags&view=tag&id%5B0%5D=62:nlrb), [October 2023 Newsletter](https://wimlaw.com/index.php?option=com_tags&view=tag&id%5B0%5D=132:october-2023-newsletter)

Section 7 of the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) establishes the federally-protected right "to engage in . . . concerted activities for the purpose of . . . mutual aid or protection." To be protected under Section 7 of the Act, employee conduct must be both "concerted" and engaged in for the purpose of "mutual aid or protection."

For many years, the NLRB struggled with the concept of how far these definitions go. In an important 1984 ruling in *Meyers Industries*, the Board held that an employee's activity is concerted when it is "engaged in with or on the authority of other employees, and not solely by and on behalf of the employee himself." 268 NLRB at 497. In its second *Meyers* ruling in 1986, the Board clarified that concerted activity under Section 7 "encompasses those circumstances where individual employees seek to initiate or to induce or to prepare for group action, as well as individual employees bringing truly group complaints to the attention of management." 281 NLRB at 887.

During the Trump Administration, in *Alstate Maintenance*, 67 NLRB No. 68 (2019), the NLRB attempted to bring clarification to the concerted activity concept by adopting a checklist of factors the determination. In its August 2023 ruling in *Miller Plastic Products, Inc.*, 372 NLRB No. 134, the current Board reverses *Alstate Maintenance* and determines that its criteria effectively imposed "a minimum threshold for a concerted activity in place of the fact-sensitive approach required under *Meyers.*" The current ruling finds that the *Alstate* ruling risks leaving certain concerted activities unprotected, such as "spontaneous, informal" protests, and questions, which are "frequently an indirect way of criticizing and drawing others to oppose a new policy," according to the current NLRB majority. For this reason, the current NLRB overrules *AlstateMaintenance* and returns to what it states as a fundamental principle of *Meyers* that "the question of whether an employee has engaged in concerted activity is a factual one based on the totality of the record evidence."

The NLRB seems to be saying that it must conduct a thorough review of all the record evidence in order to determine whether an individual employee's conduct has "some linkage to group action." For example, to be considered concerted activity, an individual employee's statement to a supervisor must either bring a truly group complaint regarding a workplace issue to management's attention, or the totality of the circumstances must support a reasonable inference that in making the statement, the employee was seeking to initiate, induce or prepare for group action. Particularly in a group meeting, the Board might reasonably infer that a protest was intended to induce group action.

In a related development, the NLRB also ruled in August that the concept that employees who take group action in the workplace for "mutual aid or protection" applies to actions supporting non-employees when those actions can benefit the employees who undertake them. *American Confederation for Children*, NLRB No. 28-CA-246878, 8/26/23. In a statement announcing the decision, NLRB Chair McFerran stated: "Standing in solidarity can be a protected act regardless of the employment status of those you stand with - the question is simply whether, in helping others, employees might help themselves and get help in return." This means that employers may not retaliate against employees for signing petitions or taking other group actions to improve working conditions for non-employees, like independent contractors, supervisors, and agricultural workers who are excluded from the Labor Act's definition of "employee."

> *Editor's Note: These cases are additional examples that the current NLRB is attempting to stretch the Labor Act in every possible way to provide protections to employees and labor organizations.*

This article is part of our October 2023 Newsletter.

[View newsletter online](https://wimlaw.com/tags/october-2023-newsletter)[
  ](https://wimlaw.com/contact)[Download the newsletter as a PDF](https://wimlaw.com/images/2023/10/2023-10-wim-law-newsletter.pdf)

- [](https://x.com/intent/post?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwimlaw.com%2Fpublications%2Fnewsletters%2Fnlrb-concerted-protections-individual-job-actions.md&text=)
- [](https://www.facebook.com/sharer/sharer.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Fwimlaw.com%2Fpublications%2Fnewsletters%2Fnlrb-concerted-protections-individual-job-actions.md)
- [](https://www.linkedin.com/sharing/share-offsite/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwimlaw.com%2Fpublications%2Fnewsletters%2Fnlrb-concerted-protections-individual-job-actions.md)
- [](mailto:?subject=NLRB%20Expands%20%22Concerted%22%20Protections%20for%20Individual%20Job%20Actions)

##  Related Content

[ ![discarded papers](https://wimlaw.com/media/yootheme/cache/36/steve-a-johnson-Kr8Tc8Rugdk-unsplash-3649e9e3.jpg) ](https://wimlaw.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1577:card-check-bargaining-rejected-appellate&catid=53)

###  [Card Check Bargaining Order Theory Rejected by Appellate Court ](https://wimlaw.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1577:card-check-bargaining-rejected-appellate&catid=53)

[Employment Law Newsletter: A Monthly Report On Labor Law Issues](https://wimlaw.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=category&id=53)

[Read more](https://wimlaw.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1577:card-check-bargaining-rejected-appellate&catid=53)

[ ![be reasonable](https://wimlaw.com/media/yootheme/cache/a3/victor-3YW2jxSblE8-unsplash-a34e1755.jpg) ](https://wimlaw.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1578:nlrb-interpret-employer-policies-reasonable&catid=53)

###  [NLRB Efforts to Interpret Employer Policies in a More Reasonable Manner](https://wimlaw.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1578:nlrb-interpret-employer-policies-reasonable&catid=53)

[Employment Law Newsletter: A Monthly Report On Labor Law Issues](https://wimlaw.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=category&id=53)

[Read more](https://wimlaw.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1578:nlrb-interpret-employer-policies-reasonable&catid=53)

[ ![journal notebook](https://wimlaw.com/media/yootheme/cache/53/jan-kahanek-g3O5ZtRk2E4-unsplash-53b1d852.jpg) ](https://wimlaw.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1575:nlrb-employer-rule&catid=53)

###  [Updates on NLRB Joint Employer Rule](https://wimlaw.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1575:nlrb-employer-rule&catid=53)

[Employment Law Newsletter: A Monthly Report On Labor Law Issues](https://wimlaw.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=category&id=53)

[Read more](https://wimlaw.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1575:nlrb-employer-rule&catid=53)

##  Get Email Updates

Receive newsletters and alerts directly in your email inbox. Sign up below.

##  Recent Content

 [ Employment Law Newsletter: A Monthly Report On Labor Law Issues ](https://wimlaw.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=category&id=53)

 [ ![ai, human reach out](https://wimlaw.com/media/yootheme/cache/f1/igor-omilaev-FHgWFzDDAOs-unsplash-f12346e8.jpg) ](https://wimlaw.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1582:fcra-litigation-challenges-employers-ai-hiring&catid=53)###  [FCRA Litigation Challenges Employers’ Use of AI Hiring Platforms](https://wimlaw.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1582:fcra-litigation-challenges-employers-ai-hiring&catid=53)

[Employment Law Newsletter: A Monthly Report On Labor Law Issues](https://wimlaw.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=category&id=53)

A January 20, 2026, class action filed against Eightfold AI, Inc. in California is sending shockwaves through the employer and AI community…

[Read more](https://wimlaw.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1582:fcra-litigation-challenges-employers-ai-hiring&catid=53)

 [ ![danger sign, skull](https://wimlaw.com/media/yootheme/cache/01/mikael-seegen-jX6WXNkvsPs-unsplash-01c1ebef.jpg) ](https://wimlaw.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1584:ai-research-discovery-requests-dangers&catid=53)###  [The Dangers of Employers Using AI Research Tools as to Discovery Requests from Plaintiffs](https://wimlaw.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1584:ai-research-discovery-requests-dangers&catid=53)

[Employment Law Newsletter: A Monthly Report On Labor Law Issues](https://wimlaw.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=category&id=53)

A second “bombshell” affecting HR pertaining to AI is a federal court ruling in New York, that a defendant’s use of AI in researching and p…

[Read more](https://wimlaw.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1584:ai-research-discovery-requests-dangers&catid=53)

 [ ![CHAT GPT](https://wimlaw.com/media/yootheme/cache/64/emiliano-vittoriosi-fvxNerA8uk0-unsplash-64a16be4.jpg) ](https://wimlaw.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1585:ai-employer-protection&catid=53)###  [Two Subsequent Cases Protect Defendant’s Use of AI as Subject to Work-product Protection](https://wimlaw.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1585:ai-employer-protection&catid=53)

[Employment Law Newsletter: A Monthly Report On Labor Law Issues](https://wimlaw.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=category&id=53)

Soon after the deciding of the above-discussed case on February 17, 2026, in U.S. v. Heppner, a criminal case in the District Court for the…

[Read more](https://wimlaw.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1585:ai-employer-protection&catid=53)

 [ ![avoid, wave away](https://wimlaw.com/media/yootheme/cache/6f/priscilla-du-preez-NQTphr4Pr60-unsplash-6fb4df83.jpg) ](https://wimlaw.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1586:employer-avoid-waiving-privileges-ai-research&catid=53)###  [Is There Anything an Employer Can Do to Avoid Waiving Privileges in Using AI Research Tools?](https://wimlaw.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1586:employer-avoid-waiving-privileges-ai-research&catid=53)

[Employment Law Newsletter: A Monthly Report On Labor Law Issues](https://wimlaw.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=category&id=53)

There are no easy answers to the above question, but some general observations will nevertheless be made. First, the New York district cou…

[Read more](https://wimlaw.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1586:employer-avoid-waiving-privileges-ai-research&catid=53)

 [ ![ai visualization](https://wimlaw.com/media/yootheme/cache/45/milad-fakurian-5yWtM3M3JKM-unsplash-45306e6d.jpg) ](https://wimlaw.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1587:ai-legal-recommendations&catid=53)###  [Suggestions on Use of AI](https://wimlaw.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1587:ai-legal-recommendations&catid=53)

[Employment Law Newsletter: A Monthly Report On Labor Law Issues](https://wimlaw.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=category&id=53)

Perhaps the starting point is to look at the type of AI platforms generally available. At a recent conference about AI use for HR, speaker…

[Read more](https://wimlaw.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1587:ai-legal-recommendations&catid=53)

 [ ![june 2026 legal immigration webinar promo graphic](https://wimlaw.com/media/yootheme/cache/45/june-2026-webinar-immigration-453d45bc.jpg) ](https://wimlaw.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1583:worksite-enforcement-tps-parole&catid=221)###  [Worksite Enforcement and TPS and Parole Status Update](https://wimlaw.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1583:worksite-enforcement-tps-parole&catid=221)

[Webinars: Employment Law "Hot Topics"](https://wimlaw.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=category&id=221)

The webinar will cover how to deal with a worksite enforcement action and various types of immigration enforcement activities. The webinar…

[Read more](https://wimlaw.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1583:worksite-enforcement-tps-parole&catid=221)

### Additional Legal Resources

[### Newsletter

Explore

 ](https://wimlaw.com/publications/newsletters)

[### Books

Explore

 ](https://wimlaw.com/publications/books)

[### Alerts

Explore

 ](https://wimlaw.com/alerts)

[### Articles

Explore

 ](https://wimlaw.com/articles)

[### Audits

Explore

 ](https://wimlaw.com/audits)

[### Events

Explore

 ](https://wimlaw.com/events)

## Schema

```json
{ "@context": "https://schema.org", "@type": "BreadcrumbList", "itemListElement": [ { "@type": "ListItem", "position": 1, "name": "Home", "item": "https://wimlaw.com" }, { "@type": "ListItem", "position": 2, "name": "Publications", "item": "https://wimlaw.com/publications" }, { "@type": "ListItem", "position": 3, "name": "Newsletters", "item": "https://wimlaw.com/publications/newsletters" }, { "@type": "ListItem", "position": 4, "name": "NLRB Expands "Concerted" Protections for Individual Job Actions", "item": "https://wimlaw.com/publications/newsletters/nlrb-concerted-protections-individual-job-actions" } ] }
```