Accessibility Tools

Skip to main content

U.S. Department of Labor Issues Final Overtime Rule

Written on .

On September 24, 2019, the U.S. Department of Labor announced its long-anticipated Final Rule on exemptions and overtime under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA).  The new rule takes effect on January 1, 2020.

Unlike its Obama-era predecessor, which was challenged in court and enjoined by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, the new Final Rule is more of an update than a reinvention of the regulatory structure.  It increases the salary thresholds necessary to exempt executive, administrative, or professional employees from the FLSA’s minimum wage and overtime pay requirements from $455 to $684 per week (equivalent to $35,568 per year for a full-year worker).  It also allows employers to count a portion of certain nondiscretionary bonuses and commissions towards meeting that salary level:  this will allow an employer to “catch up” an employee’s earnings at year-end so the employee qualifies for the exemption. The total annual compensation level for highly compensated employees (HCE) is increased from the currently-enforced level of $100,000 to $107,432 per year.  Long-standing exemptions for teachers, lawyers, and other professionals remain unchanged.

The new salary thresholds basically just reflect growth in employee earnings since the current thresholds were last updated in 2004.  Similar revisions to special salary levels allowed for workers in U.S. territories and in the motion picture industry also are included.  Detailed information about the final rule is available at https://www.dol.gov/whd/overtime2019/.

What does this mean for you?  Now is the time to take a look at your current payroll.  Make sure that salaried, exempt employees’ earnings meet or exceed the new $684/week threshold: but know that if you fall short, you may be able to make it up to them at year end (that will be December 2020) with a bonus.  Also check any “highly compensated” employees to be sure they are meeting or exceeding the new $107,432 level. 

Comment:  Unlike the previous Administration’s proposal, which sought to completely revamp the rules for overtime pay, this Final Rule should not pose difficult compliance problems.  As always, we will be happy to work with you to ensure that your questions are answered and that you can confidently plan and execute compensation policies in accordance with the law.

Questions?  Need more information?  Call Larry Stine at 404-365-0900.

Related Content

Get Email Updates

Receive newsletters and alerts directly in your email inbox. Sign up below.

Recent Content

person staning next to someone in a wheelchair, outdoors

"No-Fault" Attendance Policy Upheld against Disability Claims

Employers continue to be confused about how to handle absences related to disabilities, as to applying their "no-fault" attendance polici...
person holding up a hand, stop, indoors

NLRB Issues First Unfair Labor Practice Complaint against Non-Competes and Training Repayment

The General Counsel of the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB), former union lawyer Jennifer Abruzzo, continues to attempt to expand th...
ftc front door

Department of Justice's Anti-trust Division Announces Anti-trust Compliance Programs Include Training for Human Resources

There is relatively recent increased attention from government enforcement authorities of anti-trust issues affecting human resource prof...
stylized ai graphic

AI Hiring Bias Is New Focus of EEOC

The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission's (EEOC) Strategy Enforcement Plan for 2024-2028 published in the Federal Register last year ...
old fashio keys, hanging on a ring, attached to a wood board

Keys to Address Employee Dissatisfaction and Activism

We are in a new age of employee dissatisfaction and activism.  There were critical labor shortages during the pandemic, and increased con...
promo graphic, Procedural Accommodations: Efficiently Handling Employer Obligations

Procedural Accommodations: Efficiently Handling Employer Obligations

The ADA and other legislation – both states as well as federal -- often require “reasonable accommodations” in a multiplicity of settings...