Featured Article at The Federalist Society: Franchise With That? McDonald’s No-Poach Agreements Receive Antitrust Scrutiny
Elizabeth K. Dorminey authored another article for the Federalist Society. Here's a quick summary of what this article, Franchise With That? McDonald’s No-Poach Agreements Receive Antitrust Scrutiny, is about.
Antitrust cases usually come up in the consumer products context, where suppliers of goods are accused of anticompetitive behavior like price-fixing or tying agreements. Take the case that the Department of Justice just filed against Apple, or (more fun) one brought by California consumers desiring to purchase the iconic Hermes Birkin handbag (at $10,000 a pop, or more for exotic leathers). The shoppers filed a class action challenging the boutique’s alleged practice of limiting access to the prestige accessory by requiring would-be Birkin-bag-buyers to first pony up with purchases of scarves, shoes, and so forth: an alleged “tying” scheme in violation of the Sherman Antitrust Act.
Related Content
Get Email Updates
Recent Content

FCRA Litigation Challenges Employers’ Use of AI Hiring Platforms

The Dangers of Employers Using AI Research Tools as to Discovery Requests from Plaintiffs

Two Subsequent Cases Protect Defendant’s Use of AI as Subject to Work-product Protection

Is There Anything an Employer Can Do to Avoid Waiving Privileges in Using AI Research Tools?

Suggestions on Use of AI



