Accessibility Tools

Skip to main content

Equal Pay for Equal Play?

Written on .


Equal pay has been a hot topic recently, thanks in large part to the highly publicized EEOC complaint filed by members of the U.S. Women's Soccer team. The U.S women allege that each member of the women's national soccer team is paid thousands of dollars less than the men at nearly every level of competition, from playing "friendly" matches to qualifying and playing in the World Cup. For example, the U.S. men's and women's national teams each play a minimum of 20 friendly matches. The top five players on the men's team make an average of $406,000 each year from these games, while the top five women are guaranteed only $72,000 each year. The bonus paid to a U.S. male soccer player who wins a World Cup for the United States is $390,000, while the U.S. women each received only a $75,000 bonus for winning the World Cup. The U.S. men receive almost $69,000 for making a World Cup roster, and the U.S. Women receive $15,000 for making the World Cup team. According to the U.S. women, U.S. Soccer projects that the women's team will generate a profit of $5.2 million in 2017 while the men's team is forecast to lose almost $1 million. However, one important fact that has not been widely publicized is that the current wages of the U.S. women are the result of collective bargaining. The current collective bargaining agreement expired in 2012, and there is a legal dispute between U.S. Soccer and the players' union regarding the validity of that contract. The wage issue and the labor issue may come to a head soon--some of the U.S. women are considering a boycott (or strike?) of the 2016 Olympic Games unless their pay demands are addressed. The U.S. women are enormously popular after winning the World Cup in 2015, so this issue will continue to receive a lot of attention.

Kathleen J. Jennings
Kathleen J. Jennings
Former Principal

Kathleen J. Jennings is a former principal in the Atlanta office of Wimberly, Lawson, Steckel, Schneider, & Stine, P.C. She defends employers in employment matters, such as sexual harassment, discrimination, Wage and Hour, OSHA, restrictive covenants, and other employment litigation and provides training and counseling to employers in employment matters.

Related Content

Get Email Updates

Receive newsletters and alerts directly in your email inbox. Sign up below.

Recent Content

signing a document on a wooden table indoors

FTC Adopts Rule Banning Non-Compete Agreements

On Tuesday, April 23, 2024, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) voted 3-2, along party lines, to ban most new non-compete agreements and i...
a person in an office working late into the night

US DOL Finalizes Rule to Increase Compensation Thresholds for Overtime Eligibility

Effective July 1, 2024, salaried workers making less than $43,888 annually will be eligible for overtime pay. The salary threshold will i...

Featured Federalist Article: Text Education in Muldrow v. St. Louis: The Supreme Court Just Made Title VII Cases Easier for Plaintiffs to Win

Elizabeth K. Dorminey authored another article for the Federalist Society.  Here's a quick summary of what this article, Supreme Court...
gavel

Judge Invalidates Joint Employer Rule, and Independent Contractor Rule Takes Effect

The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) Joint Employer Regulation, which was set to take effect March 11, 2024, was invalidated by a Te...
balance of justice statue

The Importance of Fairness in Employment to the Law and to Job Satisfaction

Some of you may have heard about disgruntled employees taping phone conversations of their discharge and mentioning them on social media ...
we the people, focus, document

Major Employers Challenge Constitutionality of Labor Act

Amazon is the most recent major employer to challenge the constitutionality of the National Labor Relations Act (NLRB), joining Trader Jo...