Accessibility Tools

Skip to main content

The Latest      —

Have You Audited Your Pay Practices Lately?

Written on .


A Maryland county learned the hard way that attacking wage discrimination based on sex, race, and other protected characteristics is an EEOC enforcement priority. Last week, Prince George's County, Maryland entered into a Consent Decree with the EEOC and agreed to pay $145,402 in lost wages, damages, and costs to settle an EEOC lawsuit for a female engineer who was paid thousands less per year than male employees doing substantially the same job. (EEOC v. Prince George's Cnty., D. Md., No. 15-2942, consent decree entered 6/1/17). In addition, the County agreed to hire a consultant to ensure future wage parity between female and male employees who perform substantially similar work in the county's Department of Environment, provide equal employment opportunity training for its managers and supervisors, file periodic reports with the EEOC, and post workplace notices about the settlement. The county also increased the female engineer's annual salary from $82,294 to $107,017 to align her pay with her male counterparts.

The EEOC's lawsuit alleged, among other things, that the County paid the female engineer less than male colleagues even though she did equal, and in some cases, more complex and superior work. In March, the Court ruled that the EEOC proved the county was liable under the Equal Pay Act by paying the female engineer a lower salary than male engineers performing substantially equal work. The EEOC and the county settled to avoid "the time and expense of continued litigation," according to the Consent Decree.

Pro Tip: Have you audited your pay practices lately? Employers should regularly review their pay practices to make sure that they are not engaging in discrimination. If any differentials do exist, employers should make sure that they are based on legitimate and nondiscriminatory factors and supported by written documentation, and if they are not, they should correct them promptly. By doing so, employers may dramatically reduce the chance that they will be faced with a claim for wage discrimination.

Kathleen J. Jennings
Former Principal

Kathleen J. Jennings is a former principal in the Atlanta office of Wimberly, Lawson, Steckel, Schneider, & Stine, P.C. She defends employers in employment matters, such as sexual harassment, discrimination, Wage and Hour, OSHA, restrictive covenants, and other employment litigation and provides training and counseling to employers in employment matters.

Related Content

Get Email Updates

Receive newsletters and alerts directly in your email inbox. Sign up below.

Recent Content

end of words, pavement
The Trump Administration has acted to terminate TPS status for several countries.  Of course, litigation has followed each notice of termin…
we are hiring sign
The Economist magazine reports that job interviews are “the worst way to select people, except for all the others.”  One of the more encour…
fighting rams
Of primary importance is that the best avoidance is to recognize the early warning signs.  In other words, at the beginning of a confrontat…
shutdown, washington
A good amount of publicity has come out recently about two major closings that employers blame on their unions.  In the most recent, at the…
gavel
In December of 2025, an Oregon federal judge refused Union Pacific’s effort to set aside a $27 million verdict in a suit from the worker al…
hello
Discrimination rules applicable to national origin is a priority for the current chairperson of  the Equal Employment Opportunity Commissio…