Accessibility Tools

Skip to main content

NEW YEAR OUTLOOK: OSHA ELECTRONIC INJURY REPORTING RULE STILL IN PLAY

Written on .


On May 11, 2016, OSHA issued a final rule requiring employers to electronically submit injury and illness data on an annual basis. The rule also included in the preamble guidance for employers on the impact of the new anti-retaliation provisions on drug and alcohol testing and safety incentive programs in the workplace. Various trade associations filed suit challenging various provisions in the final rule, but a preliminary injunction was denied by a court ruling on November 28, 2016.


 

The "anti-retaliation" provisions of the new rule went into effect on December 1, 2016. The rule requires employers to inform employees of their right to report work-related injuries and illnesses without retaliation, and the notice requirement may be satisfied by posting the OSHA Job Safety and Health - It's The Law worker rights poster (from April 2015 or later).


 

Some of the controversial portions of the anti-retaliation provisions that are to be tested in court include a provision dealing with the circumstances under which an employer may drug test an employee who reports an injury or illness. In evaluating whether an employer has an objectively reasonable basis for such testing, the employer is supposed to determine whether it has a reasonable basis for believing that drug use by the reporting employee could have contributed to the injury or illness. Employers may continue to drug test in accordance with state workers' compensation laws or other state or federal laws.


 

The electronic reporting rule does not prohibit safety incentive programs in and of themselves, but OSHA takes a position that the safety incentive programs should not be applied in a way that penalizes employees for reporting injuries or illnesses. Additional guidance is available at: https://www.osha.gov/recordkeeping/ modernization_guidance.html.


 

Kathleen J. Jennings
Former Principal

Kathleen J. Jennings is a former principal in the Atlanta office of Wimberly, Lawson, Steckel, Schneider, & Stine, P.C. She defends employers in employment matters, such as sexual harassment, discrimination, Wage and Hour, OSHA, restrictive covenants, and other employment litigation and provides training and counseling to employers in employment matters.

Related Content

Get Email Updates

Receive newsletters and alerts directly in your email inbox. Sign up below.

Recent Content

stamp, desk table
In a first for at least the last decade or so, the EEOC has brought a discrimination claim alleging the New York Times promotion practices…
letter
Suppose a former employee following termination makes threatening, harassing, defamatory or otherwise inappropriate statements or violates…
changing leaf
On August 17, James Macy became the third GOP-appointed member of the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB), giving the NLRB three members…
glasses, beach, horizon
On August 26, 2026, the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) addressed employee wellness programs that permit fees on workers’ health premiums fo…
infant, child, mother
Federal judges have now ruled in over a dozen cases involving the 2022 Providing Urgent Maternal Protections for Nursing Mothers Act, commo…
tipping over pawn
As a new enforcement approach, ICE has done away with an I-9 enforcement practice giving employers a period of time to correct minor or tec…