Accessibility Tools

Skip to main content

Supreme Court Strikes Down Public Sector Union Agency Fees

Written on .



In a highly anticipated decision (at least among labor law attorneys), the U.S. Supreme Court held that public sector unions cannot require nonmembers to pay "agency fees." (Janus v. AFSCME , U.S., No. 16-1466, 6/27/18).

What is an "agency fee?" If a majority of the employees in a bargaining unit vote to be represented by a union, that union is designated as the exclusive representative of all the employees, even those who do not join. Only the union may engage in collective bargaining; individual employees may not be represented by another agent or negotiate directly with their employer. Nonmembers are required to pay what is generally called an "agency fee," i.e., a percentage of the full union dues.

In a 5-4 decision, written by Justice Alito, the U.S Supreme Court held that neither a public sector union nor state law can require a non-consenting employees to pay agency fees because the First Amendment is violated when money is taken from nonconsenting employees for a public-sector union; employees must choose to support the union before anything is taken from them. Accordingly, neither an agency fee nor any other form of payment to a public-sector union may be deducted from an employee, nor may any other attempt be made to collect such a payment, unless the employee affirmatively consents to pay.

The Court rejected arguments by the union that all employees should help subsidize union activities, such as collective bargaining and grievance resolution, because those activities benefit all employees. The Court also expressly overruled Abood v. Detroit Bd. of Ed., 431 U. S. 209 (1977), which had upheld the assessment of agency fees.

This decision is expected to have a substantial financial impact on public sector unions; some estimate that they could lose tens of millions of dollars from the loss of agency fees. The loss of money could also result in a loss of effectiveness and political power. At present, a larger percentage of public sector employees belong to unions than private sector employees: unions represent about 34 percent of government workers, compared with about 6 percent of private sector employees.

Kathleen J. Jennings
Former Principal

Kathleen J. Jennings is a former principal in the Atlanta office of Wimberly, Lawson, Steckel, Schneider, & Stine, P.C. She defends employers in employment matters, such as sexual harassment, discrimination, Wage and Hour, OSHA, restrictive covenants, and other employment litigation and provides training and counseling to employers in employment matters.

Related Content

Get Email Updates

Receive newsletters and alerts directly in your email inbox. Sign up below.

Recent Content

stamp, desk table
In a first for at least the last decade or so, the EEOC has brought a discrimination claim alleging the New York Times promotion practices…
letter
Suppose a former employee following termination makes threatening, harassing, defamatory or otherwise inappropriate statements or violates…
changing leaf
On August 17, James Macy became the third GOP-appointed member of the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB), giving the NLRB three members…
glasses, beach, horizon
On August 26, 2026, the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) addressed employee wellness programs that permit fees on workers’ health premiums fo…
infant, child, mother
Federal judges have now ruled in over a dozen cases involving the 2022 Providing Urgent Maternal Protections for Nursing Mothers Act, commo…
tipping over pawn
As a new enforcement approach, ICE has done away with an I-9 enforcement practice giving employers a period of time to correct minor or tec…