Accessibility Tools

Skip to main content

You’d Better Believe That Atheists Are Protected From Religious Discrimination

Written on .


A case out of Kentucky reminds us that religious discrimination claims can be asserted by atheists who are subjected to harassment on the basis of their beliefs. In Queen v. City of Bowling Green , W.D. Ky., No. 1:16-CV-00131, (7/20/18), a firefighter sued the City of Bowling Green, Kentucky for religious discrimination. The firefighter, who is an atheist, alleged that supervisors and co-workers made hostile and demeaning remarks concerning his atheism and about non-Christians generally, and that the harassment was so severe that he was eventually forced to resign his employment. Among the remarks he alleged were a fire captain's statement that theists "deserved to burn," and two chiefs told him that he should join a church and "get right with Jesus." In addition, he was forced to participate in Bible study during meals at his fire station.

The district court denied the City's motion for summary judgment, sending the case to a jury trial. In his decision, the District Judge wrote that "[a]lthough atheism is the absence of religious beliefs, it is still a protected class for purpose of Title VII." Other federal courts, including the U.S. Courts of Appeals for the Fifth and Seventh Circuits, have held that Title VII protects atheist employees against religious discrimination. For example, the Fifth Circuit ruled that an employer unlawfully required an atheist to attend staff meetings that including religious talk and prayer.

The takeaway: Employers should respect the religious beliefs of their employees, and in some cases, make reasonable accommodations for those beliefs.

Kathleen J. Jennings
Former Principal

Kathleen J. Jennings is a former principal in the Atlanta office of Wimberly, Lawson, Steckel, Schneider, & Stine, P.C. She defends employers in employment matters, such as sexual harassment, discrimination, Wage and Hour, OSHA, restrictive covenants, and other employment litigation and provides training and counseling to employers in employment matters.

Related Content

Get Email Updates

Receive newsletters and alerts directly in your email inbox. Sign up below.

Recent Content

chaotic light lines
On July 10, 2026, E-Verify notified employers that work authorization is extended temporarily through July 24, 2026, for workers from the f…
connected spheres
The U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) announced on April 22, 2026, a new proposed rule clarifying when multiple employers are jointly liable f…
plaintiff sign
The Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) encourages the use and enforcement of arbitration agreements, although the Act contains an exception for…
3
On April 13, 2026, President Trump nominated James Macy to fill the third vacant Republican seat on the National Labor Relations Board (NLR…
deception
An employer official named in a graphic sexual harassment suit brought a counter-claim against her accuser for defamation, calling his alle…
pointing to computer
No personnel issues have been debated longer and more thoroughly than that of the utility of performance reviews.  Some argue that such rev…