Accessibility Tools

Skip to main content

You’d Better Believe That Atheists Are Protected From Religious Discrimination

Written on .


A case out of Kentucky reminds us that religious discrimination claims can be asserted by atheists who are subjected to harassment on the basis of their beliefs. In Queen v. City of Bowling Green , W.D. Ky., No. 1:16-CV-00131, (7/20/18), a firefighter sued the City of Bowling Green, Kentucky for religious discrimination. The firefighter, who is an atheist, alleged that supervisors and co-workers made hostile and demeaning remarks concerning his atheism and about non-Christians generally, and that the harassment was so severe that he was eventually forced to resign his employment. Among the remarks he alleged were a fire captain's statement that theists "deserved to burn," and two chiefs told him that he should join a church and "get right with Jesus." In addition, he was forced to participate in Bible study during meals at his fire station.

The district court denied the City's motion for summary judgment, sending the case to a jury trial. In his decision, the District Judge wrote that "[a]lthough atheism is the absence of religious beliefs, it is still a protected class for purpose of Title VII." Other federal courts, including the U.S. Courts of Appeals for the Fifth and Seventh Circuits, have held that Title VII protects atheist employees against religious discrimination. For example, the Fifth Circuit ruled that an employer unlawfully required an atheist to attend staff meetings that including religious talk and prayer.

The takeaway: Employers should respect the religious beliefs of their employees, and in some cases, make reasonable accommodations for those beliefs.

Kathleen J. Jennings
Former Principal

Kathleen J. Jennings is a former principal in the Atlanta office of Wimberly, Lawson, Steckel, Schneider, & Stine, P.C. She defends employers in employment matters, such as sexual harassment, discrimination, Wage and Hour, OSHA, restrictive covenants, and other employment litigation and provides training and counseling to employers in employment matters.

Related Content

Get Email Updates

Receive newsletters and alerts directly in your email inbox. Sign up below.

Recent Content

ai, human reach out
A January 20, 2026, class action filed against Eightfold AI, Inc. in California is sending shockwaves through the employer and AI community…
danger sign, skull
A second “bombshell” affecting HR pertaining to AI is a federal court ruling in New York, that a defendant’s use of AI in researching and p…
CHAT GPT
Soon after the deciding of the above-discussed case on February 17, 2026, in U.S. v. Heppner, a criminal case in the District Court for the…
avoid, wave away
There are no easy answers to the above question, but some general observations will nevertheless be made.  First, the New York district cou…
ai visualization
Perhaps the starting point is to look at the type of AI platforms generally available.  At a recent conference about AI use for HR, speaker…
june 2026 legal immigration webinar promo graphic
The webinar will cover how to deal with a worksite enforcement action and various types of immigration enforcement activities. The webinar…