Accessibility Tools

Skip to main content

CONFIDENTIALITY REQUIREMENTS FOR MEDICAL INQUIRIES

Written on .

Both the ADA and the Genetic Information Non-Discrimination Act (GINA) have confidentiality requirements. Some of the requirements relate to activities lawful under the ADA, but not under GINA. The ADA focuses on actual conditions, while GINA focuses on genetic information that may never develop into a condition.

An example of the difference is the situation in which an employee has job issues suggesting alcoholism, and the employer has legitimate reason to ask questions or even send the employee to a doctor. If the doctor, who serves as the employer’s agent for this purpose, asks questions about alcoholism, the question may be permissible under the ADA. However, if the doctor for the employer asks questions about a family history of alcohol, it becomes a prohibited question under GINA.

For these reasons, it is a good idea for employers to avoid receiving GINA-protected information, because not only is the seeking of such information prohibited, but also additional confidentiality requirements apply. Several proactive steps can be taken, such as directing company doctors or whoever is conducting employers’ medical inquiries or exams, not to ask for or collect genetic information. Another proactive step is to write a warning to the applicant or employee who is taking the exam or filing out health forms, or to the doctor who is conducting the medical inquiry or exam, not to seek or reveal any genetic information. The EEOC has regulations that provide some sample language that should be used for this purpose, or at least reviewed.

Related Content

Get Email Updates

Receive newsletters and alerts directly in your email inbox. Sign up below.

Recent Content

we are hiring sign
The Economist magazine reports that job interviews are “the worst way to select people, except for all the others.”  One of the more encour…
fighting rams
Of primary importance is that the best avoidance is to recognize the early warning signs.  In other words, at the beginning of a confrontat…
shutdown, washington
A good amount of publicity has come out recently about two major closings that employers blame on their unions.  In the most recent, at the…
gavel
In December of 2025, an Oregon federal judge refused Union Pacific’s effort to set aside a $27 million verdict in a suit from the worker al…
hello
Discrimination rules applicable to national origin is a priority for the current chairperson of  the Equal Employment Opportunity Commissio…
bills and pills
According to a December 2025 report from the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS), increases in wages and benefits increased 3.5% in the twelve…