Controversial Pro-union Pro Act Passed by House

Written on .

The Protecting the Right to Organize Act (the PRO Act) has been a long-term goal of organized labor.  It previously passed the House of Representatives last year, but the Democrats never had sufficient power in the Senate to bring the bill to a vote there.  On March 9, 2021, the House voted 225-206 to pass H.R. 842, the PRO Act.   This Bill has long been considered to be a "Christmas tree list" of demands by organized labor.  Among other things, this Bill as passed by the House would do the following.

  • Voids state "right-to-work" laws and allow union agreements to require all employees to pay fees to cover the cost of union activities as a condition of employment;
  • Stipulates that strikes could not be prohibited based on their "duration, scope, frequency, or intermittence," and repeal existing restrictions on "secondary" boycotts and picketing for recognition, as well as prohibit employers from permanently replacing an employee who strikes, prohibits locking out or otherwise withholding employment by employers to influence bargaining, prohibits misclassifying as independent contractor an employee covered by the Labor Act, and prohibits requiring employees to attend employer campaign activities unrelated to their job (so-called "captive audience meetings");
  • Requires the NLRB to award lost wages and damages to employees discharged or suffering economic harm because of an employer's Labor Act violation, and also allow additional amounts as liquidated damages;
  • Provides for such wages and damages even to workers residing in the U.S. illegally; 
  • Grants immediate temporary court relief to employees terminated or significantly affected by an employer's interference with labor rights, unless a court rules that there is not a reasonable likelihood that the claim will succeed;
  • Allows employees to bring a civil action against their employer in a federal district court after sixty (60) days of filing a claim with the NLRB, and the court could award lost wages, damages, and reasonable attorneys' fees;
  • Effectively reverses the Supreme Court ruling in Epic Systems allowing employers to enforce arbitration agreements with class-action waivers;
  • Authorizes the NLRB to impose penalties on employers, such as $50,000.00 if an employer's violation results in discharge or other serious economic harm which can be doubled to as much as $100,000.00 for multiple violations in the preceding five (5) years;
  • Provides a $500.00 penalty if an employer does not post a Notice of Employees Rights and Protections, and inform new employees of such information, or submit the bargaining unit voter list, plus a penalty of as much as $10,000.00 per day for an employer that does not comply with an NLRB order;
  • Requires the NLRB to consider a union's proposed bargaining unit to be appropriate if the employees share a "community of interest" that is sufficiently distinct from others;
  • Requires employers to provide unions with a list of all bargaining unit employees within two (2) business days after the NLRB approves an election;
  • Employers would not even have standing to participate in the representation case proceeding;
  • Allows the NLRB to certify a union and require bargaining with the union not only where employees vote in favor of the union, but also where they have not voted in favor of the union because of election interference by an employer but have signed authorization cards designating the union (the old "card-check" concept).
  • The NLRB would have to suspend the processing of an election petition until an unfair labor practice charge is remedied or dismissed, thus giving a union a lot of flexibility as to when to arrange a vote;
  • After union certification, the employer and union would have to start negotiating an initial bargaining agreement within ten (10) days of the union's written request, or within an additional period agreed by the parties - if there isn't an agreement after ninety (90) days of bargaining, the dispute would be referred to a three-member arbitration panel which would write a contract binding for two (2) years (first contract arbitration);
  • Broadens the definition of joint employer regardless of whether control is considered direct or indirect as well as whether control is exercised through reserved authority or not;
  • Verifies that workers performing any service would be considered employees and not independent contractors unless the workers is free from the employer's control, the services are outside the employer's usual course of business, and the worker is engaged in an independently established role related to the service (the so-called "ABC Test");
  • Modifies the definition of "supervisor" to state that such individual must engage in supervisory activities "for a majority of the individual's work time;"
  • Requires employers to disclose to the Labor Department arrangements with consultants or attorneys to indirectly persuade employees on their union rights (the so-called "Persuader Rule");
  • Appeals by employers to federal appeals courts would be limited.

This bill already has at least 40 co-sponsors in the U.S. Senate, where the Democrats now have a majority since the Vice President can break any tie.  Republicans will filibuster the bill, but the situation would change dramatically should the Democrats elect to remove the filibuster from the Senate procedures.

This is part of our April 2021 Newsletter.

Click here to download the newsletter PDF

Get Email Updates

Receive newsletters and alerts directly in your email inbox. Sign up below.

Recent Content

Women signing papers at a table indoors

Trump Regulation Requiring EEOC to Conciliate Rescinded

The current administration has moved rapidly to eliminate the Trump administrators, even during the terms of their employment, and to eli...
Port-au-Prince, Haiti - Outdoors, houses on the hillside

TDPP Extended for Six Countries

More than 400,000 citizens of six foreign countries who live and work in the U.S. under Temporary Protected Status (TPS) are able to stay...
a group of people protesting outdoors, with jackets in the cold

Issues Related to Safety and Work-related Issues, Pertaining to Walk-outs, Sit-ins, Protests, Etc

The current situation is an appropriate time to remind employers of their obligations under federal laws dealing with not only safety pro...
Covid Vaccine Clinic, Parking Sign, Outdoors

Biden Issues Executive Order Attempting to Require Covid Vaccination & Testing

In what many consider President Biden's most bold move regarding COVID-19, he issued an Executive Order on September 9, 2021 in an effort...
candles burning on a rack indoors in the dark

Dealing With Religious Objections to a COVID-19 Vaccine Requirement

In our discussions of rules mandating COVID-19 vaccines, we’ve mentioned the two possible exemptions to a vaccine requirement: disability...
yellow rubber gloves on hands reach high

Protected Concerted Activity in the Era of COVID-19: What Employers Need to Know

The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) is one of the federal agencies that many employers do not have on their radar. The NLRB is most...

Wimberly, Lawson, Steckel, Schneider & Stine

3400 Peachtree Road, Ste 400 / Lenox Towers / Atlanta, GA 30326 /404.365.0900

Where Experience Counts


Thank you for visiting the firm's website. Please note that this website is intended for general information purposes only and does not constitute an offer of representation or create an attorney-client relationship with the firm. The firm welcomes receipt of electronic mail but the act of sending electronic mail alone does not create an attorney-client relationship. You may reproduce materials available at this site for your own personal use and for non-commercial distribution. All copies must include the firm's copyright notice.

© 2020 Wimberly, Lawson, Steckel, Schneider & Stine P.C. | Site By JSM