Written on .

Traditionally, the discrimination laws have not addressed dress codes and hair styles, because these characteristics are mutable.  That is, most people can readily change their hair styles and dress.  For example, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit in Atlanta has stated in the last year that "every court to have considered the issue" has indicated that hair style discrimination is not a type of racial bias barred by federal law because it is a mutable, or alterable, characteristic.  EEOC v. Catastrophe Management Solutions, 129 FEP Cases 935 (C.A. 11, 2016).  However, workers who bring religious-based hair discrimination claims appear to have a better chance of prevailing.  In one case, for example, the Third Circuit in Philadelphia, found that an employer's policy failed to accommodate an employee with DREAD LOCKS, which were maintained as part of his Rastafarian faith.  The EEOC last year secured a $4.9 million discrimination settlement with UPS, on behalf of job applicants who wore beards and long hair for religious reasons. 

More recently, however, there have been several changes in local laws.  Two major cities, New York City and Chicago, passed local laws protecting hair styles closely associated with racial or ethnic identities.  Some research suggests, for example, that a majority of black women have to change their hair to get hired or otherwise accepted in the workplace.  California and New York are the first states to pass a law adding the phrase "inclusive of traits historically associated with race, including, but not limited to, hair texture and protective hair styles.""

Employers seem to have even more discretion in setting appropriate dress codes in the workplace.  The main type of discrimination issue that might arise is not one based on race but more likely to be one based on sex, in situations where females are held to tighter dress codes than males.  Requiring generally professional type dress equally applicable to males and females would not seem to violate these concepts.  A modern trend in industry is to allow for more informal types of dress, as a recruitment and retention tool.  In a recent development, even the stodgy New York financial firm, KKR, along with other Wall Street companies, relaxed their dress codes and no longer require suits, ties or heels, allowing employees flexibility.  At KKR, one of the world's largest private-equity firms, the memo does not specify exactly what types of clothes are appropriate, but instead use general terms like, "We trust you all to strike the right balance and exercise good judgment . . . .  At the same time, we recognize that many of our clients and other external relationships have a more formal expectation of "professionalism" . . . so please always have business attire available."

Get Email Updates

Receive newsletters and alerts directly in your email inbox. Sign up below.

Recent Content

microphone, indoors

Union Organizing Efforts across the Country Continue to Draw Attention

Recent Gallup polls indicate that the public has a favorable opinion of unions with a near record high of 68%, and with the "great resign...
supreme court of the united states

Supreme Court Explains Limits to Arbitration Exceptions to Court Litigation

A majority of employees in the U.S. are now covered by individual arbitration agreements prohibiting them from bringing lawsuits in court...
bullseye target, darts

10 Things That Might Make Your Company an Attractive Target to a Plaintiff's Lawyer

Wimberly & Lawson attorneys Kathleen Jennings, Paul Oliver, and Jim Wimberly conducted a webinar on June 2, 2022, dealing with the ab...
person completing documents, indoors on a table with a mug

Employer Wins Lawsuit over Background Checks Even Though It Failed to Show Applicant Copy of the Report

The Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) places a number of obligations on employers who use third-party background or credit check companies...
interview between a man and woman indoors

E17: The Bad Job Interview

In this episode, host Thom Jennings and attorney Kathleen Jennings discuss a Reddit post about a job interview that went terribly wrong. ...

Wimberly, Lawson, Steckel, Schneider & Stine

3400 Peachtree Road, Ste 400 / Lenox Towers / Atlanta, GA 30326 /404.365.0900

Where Experience Counts

Thank you for visiting the firm's website. Please note that this website is intended for general information purposes only and does not constitute an offer of representation or create an attorney-client relationship with the firm. The firm welcomes receipt of electronic mail but the act of sending electronic mail alone does not create an attorney-client relationship. You may reproduce materials available at this site for your own personal use and for non-commercial distribution. All copies must include the firm's copyright notice.

© 2022 Wimberly, Lawson, Steckel, Schneider & Stine P.C. | Site By JSM