Written on .

Obesity remains a controversial issue under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).  Employers received some relief from the issue in a recent court ruling that obesity unaccompanied by an underlying physiological condition is not a disability protected by federal law.  Richardson v. CTA, No. 17-3508 (C.A. 4, 6/12/19); see also Aumara v. Monsanto, 2019 BL218595 (E.D. La., 6/13/19) (even if morbid obesity is an impairment, plaintiff cannot show his weight substantially limits major life activity).  In this case, plaintiff was a severely obese bus driver with the Chicago Transit Authority.  The Authority contended that the plaintiff's weight exceeded the limit of the driver's seats and made it difficult for him to operate the bus pedals properly.  The court found that the employer thus had non-discriminatory reasons for the termination.  More importantly, the court joined three other federal appeals courts in finding that obesity unaccompanied by an underlying physiological condition simply isn't protected.  The court saw weight as a physical characteristic just like eye and hair color, not a disability. 

Editor's Note:  While the Second, Sixth and Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals has reached results similar to that of the Seventh Circuit in the Richardson case, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and the First Circuit have issued rulings indicating that obesity alone could be protected from discrimination.

Get Email Updates

Receive newsletters and alerts directly in your email inbox. Sign up below.

Recent Content

microphone, indoors

Union Organizing Efforts across the Country Continue to Draw Attention

Recent Gallup polls indicate that the public has a favorable opinion of unions with a near record high of 68%, and with the "great resign...
supreme court of the united states

Supreme Court Explains Limits to Arbitration Exceptions to Court Litigation

A majority of employees in the U.S. are now covered by individual arbitration agreements prohibiting them from bringing lawsuits in court...
bullseye target, darts

10 Things That Might Make Your Company an Attractive Target to a Plaintiff's Lawyer

Wimberly & Lawson attorneys Kathleen Jennings, Paul Oliver, and Jim Wimberly conducted a webinar on June 2, 2022, dealing with the ab...
person completing documents, indoors on a table with a mug

Employer Wins Lawsuit over Background Checks Even Though It Failed to Show Applicant Copy of the Report

The Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) places a number of obligations on employers who use third-party background or credit check companies...
interview between a man and woman indoors

E17: The Bad Job Interview

In this episode, host Thom Jennings and attorney Kathleen Jennings discuss a Reddit post about a job interview that went terribly wrong. ...

Wimberly, Lawson, Steckel, Schneider & Stine

3400 Peachtree Road, Ste 400 / Lenox Towers / Atlanta, GA 30326 /404.365.0900

Where Experience Counts

Thank you for visiting the firm's website. Please note that this website is intended for general information purposes only and does not constitute an offer of representation or create an attorney-client relationship with the firm. The firm welcomes receipt of electronic mail but the act of sending electronic mail alone does not create an attorney-client relationship. You may reproduce materials available at this site for your own personal use and for non-commercial distribution. All copies must include the firm's copyright notice.

© 2022 Wimberly, Lawson, Steckel, Schneider & Stine P.C. | Site By JSM