Accessibility Tools

Skip to main content

USE OF PAYROLL CARDS RAISING LEGAL AND STRATEGIC ISSUES

Written on .

Many employers have found the use of payroll cards to be extremely advantageous, not only to the employer, but to employees as well. Employers can save around $50.00 per employee per year, due to eliminating the need to physically provide a paycheck, reducing or eliminating bank service fees, and reducing paycheck fraud. Similarly, many employees do not have a bank account and thus no access to a direct-deposit program.

During this past summer, numerous legal issues were exposed in litigation against a McDonald's franchisee claiming that McDonald's restaurants forced employees to receive their wages through payroll debit cards. The plaintiff alleged that the cards used carried associated fees that effectively reduced employees' pay, including charges of $1.50 for ATM withdrawals, $1.00 for balance inquiries, $.75 for online bill payments, and a $10.00 per month inactivity fee if money remains on the card longer than three months. The franchisee defendant thereafter announced that it would allow employees to choose whether to be paid by debit card, direct deposit, or paper check. Later, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB), a federal consumer regulator, announced that employers cannot require workers to receive their paychecks on debit cards. The CFPB said that employers must provide other options as to how employees receive their wages. Holders of the payroll cards are also entitled to disclosures of any fees and access to their account history, the CFPB said.

Many employers have already responded to these issues by automatically enrolling workers in a payroll card program, but allowing them to sign up for other options, such as direct deposit.

Related Content

Get Email Updates

Receive newsletters and alerts directly in your email inbox. Sign up below.

Recent Content

person staning next to someone in a wheelchair, outdoors

"No-Fault" Attendance Policy Upheld against Disability Claims

Employers continue to be confused about how to handle absences related to disabilities, as to applying their "no-fault" attendance polici...
person holding up a hand, stop, indoors

NLRB Issues First Unfair Labor Practice Complaint against Non-Competes and Training Repayment

The General Counsel of the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB), former union lawyer Jennifer Abruzzo, continues to attempt to expand th...
ftc front door

Department of Justice's Anti-trust Division Announces Anti-trust Compliance Programs Include Training for Human Resources

There is relatively recent increased attention from government enforcement authorities of anti-trust issues affecting human resource prof...
stylized ai graphic

AI Hiring Bias Is New Focus of EEOC

The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission's (EEOC) Strategy Enforcement Plan for 2024-2028 published in the Federal Register last year ...
old fashio keys, hanging on a ring, attached to a wood board

Keys to Address Employee Dissatisfaction and Activism

We are in a new age of employee dissatisfaction and activism.  There were critical labor shortages during the pandemic, and increased con...
promo graphic, Procedural Accommodations: Efficiently Handling Employer Obligations

Procedural Accommodations: Efficiently Handling Employer Obligations

The ADA and other legislation – both states as well as federal -- often require “reasonable accommodations” in a multiplicity of settings...