Accessibility Tools

Skip to main content

EEOC Issues Study about the Effect of Requesting Pay Data from Employers

Written on .

A July study was released about the effect of the race and gender pay data the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) collected from employers in 2019 and 2020.  The pay data collection was added as a "Component 2" of the EEOC's annual diversity report known as the EEO-1.  The EEO-1 form describes a workforce's race, sex and ethnic makeup. 

The report on the collection of the race and gender pay data by the National Academies of Sciences found the information useful to the EEOC.  However, the report also said that the 10 job categories used were not specific enough and the 12 pay bands were too broad.  There is no current pay data requirement to complete the EEO-1 form, and the EEOC Commission still has a 3-2 Republican majority.

The EEOC has not indicated whether such pay data will be required in the future, but the current EEOC Commissioners have totally different views of the impact of the recent study.  The three Republican commissioners each released statements that the main takeaway from the report was that the Agency's attempt at collecting pay data was deeply flawed.  They recommended that any future collection of pay data go through a rulemaking process.  Current Democrat EEOC Chair Charlotte Burroughs said the study confirmed that collecting and analyzing such pay data can be a useful tool in preventing and combating pay discrimination.  The employer community is concerned about the level of burden that pay data reporting requirements may have, as well as the misleading nature of the conclusions from the data.

This article is part of our September 2022 Newsletter.

View newsletter online

Download the newsletter as a PDF

Related Content

Get Email Updates

Receive newsletters and alerts directly in your email inbox. Sign up below.
gavel

Judge Invalidates Joint Employer Rule, and Independent Contractor Rule Takes Effect

The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) Joint Employer Regulation, which was set to take effect March 11, 2024, was invalidated by a Te...
balance of justice statue

The Importance of Fairness in Employment to the Law and to Job Satisfaction

Some of you may have heard about disgruntled employees taping phone conversations of their discharge and mentioning them on social media ...
we the people, focus, document

Major Employers Challenge Constitutionality of Labor Act

Amazon is the most recent major employer to challenge the constitutionality of the National Labor Relations Act (NLRB), joining Trader Jo...
starbucks drink on a table

Starbucks' Big Change in Labor Policies

Starbucks' new public commitment to work with its union antagonists to resolve issues has been called a landmark in labor relations.  In ...
smiling blocks

Judge Orders Survey Data to Be Revealed from Employer EEO-1 Reports

Employers are supposed to file annually the EEO-1, Standard Form 100, with the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL).  This requirement applies ...
mcdonalds sign, blue sky

Featured Article at The Federalist Society: Franchise With That? McDonald’s No-Poach Agreements Receive Antitrust Scrutiny

Elizabeth K. Dorminey authored another article for the Federalist Society. Here's a quick summary of what this article, Franchise With ...