Accessibility Tools

Skip to main content

Employer Can Pursue Fraud Claim against Undocumented Worker

Written on .

Undocumented workers generally have the right to bring lawsuits under the wage-hour and discrimination laws.  While their right to reinstatement and future pay may be limited because of the immigration laws, they generally are considered to have remedies nevertheless under these laws.  At the same time, when employers are sued, they in theory have the right to bring counter-suits or counter-claims.  One employer recently brought such a counter-claim of fraud based on the Plaintiff’s presentation of fake documents to gain employment.  Oxlaj v. Darby Road Pub. House & Rest., 2018 BL 86995, D.N.J., No. 2:16-cv-01180, 3/14/18.  

The court allowed a counter-claim to be made in this situation, in which the employer is seeking a return of monies the plaintiff received while working there.  It should be noted, however, that the case is in a preliminary stage, and this result is not a final ruling.

The concept of the case is extremely interesting because there are many other circumstances in which employers are plagued with "fake" applicants.  The applicant may be a union organizer, a reporter, a safety or animal rights activist, or various other types of persons seeking to gain employment for reasons unrelated to wanting the job.  The question is whether more employers will counter-sue for fraud or related claims in these circumstances. 

A great deal of caution is necessary because the retaliation laws may come into play.  That is, it is possible for a court to rule that a counter-suit is really retaliatory based on the bringing of the complaint against the employer.  On the other hand, the counter-suing employer may argue that certain counter-claims are mandatory or the employer is waiving its legal right to sue.  Obviously, these are complicated issues. 

Related Content

Get Email Updates

Receive newsletters and alerts directly in your email inbox. Sign up below.

Featured Federalist Article: Text Education in Muldrow v. St. Louis: The Supreme Court Just Made Title VII Cases Easier for Plaintiffs to Win

Elizabeth K. Dorminey authored another article for the Federalist Society.  Here's a quick summary of what this article, Supreme Court...
gavel

Judge Invalidates Joint Employer Rule, and Independent Contractor Rule Takes Effect

The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) Joint Employer Regulation, which was set to take effect March 11, 2024, was invalidated by a Te...
balance of justice statue

The Importance of Fairness in Employment to the Law and to Job Satisfaction

Some of you may have heard about disgruntled employees taping phone conversations of their discharge and mentioning them on social media ...
we the people, focus, document

Major Employers Challenge Constitutionality of Labor Act

Amazon is the most recent major employer to challenge the constitutionality of the National Labor Relations Act (NLRB), joining Trader Jo...
starbucks drink on a table

Starbucks' Big Change in Labor Policies

Starbucks' new public commitment to work with its union antagonists to resolve issues has been called a landmark in labor relations.  In ...
smiling blocks

Judge Orders Survey Data to Be Revealed from Employer EEO-1 Reports

Employers are supposed to file annually the EEO-1, Standard Form 100, with the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL).  This requirement applies ...