Accessibility Tools

Skip to main content

NLRB Changes In Handbook Standards

Written on .

On December 14, 2017, the new NLRB majority overturned the Obama-era rule that placed severe limits on employer handbook and policy rules that had been declared illegal if an employee might interpret the rule as prohibiting the exercise of union or concerted activities.  Such broad rules were said to be illegal because they "chilled" legitimate union or concerted activities.  In place of the "reasonably construe" standard, the NLRB has established a new test that focuses on "(I) the nature and extent of the potential impact on NLRB rights, and (ii) legitimate justifications associated with the rule."  The Boeing Company, 365 NLRB No. 154 (2017).  If the justification for the rule outweighs the potential impact on employees’ rights, the rule is not deemed unlawful.  Applying the new test to Boeing’s no-camera rule, the majority found that the employer’s justifications for the rule, including the protection of information implicating national security, proprietary trade secrets, and employees’ personal information, outweighed any potential impact on employees’ protected concerted activity. 

Under the Boeing case, any employer rules are lawful to maintain if they cannot be reasonably interpreted to impinge on NLRA rights, or the employer’s interests are sufficiently justified.  The Board indicated in the Boeing ruling that in general, civility policies requiring workplace harmony are now acceptable for employers to enforce.  Many expressed concern about Obama-era rulings which seem to create a conflict between the employers’ anti-harassment rules and NLRB policies.  The new Boeing precedent is likely to ultimately result in changes in NLRB policies toward confidentiality rules and other types of behavioral rules.   With so many changes now being made to the NLRB handbook and policy rules, employers will have to decide how aggressive they want to be regarding the uncertainty between the Obama-era rules and the new rules as established in the Boeing case. 

Related Content

Get Email Updates

Receive newsletters and alerts directly in your email inbox. Sign up below.

Recent Content

person staning next to someone in a wheelchair, outdoors

"No-Fault" Attendance Policy Upheld against Disability Claims

Employers continue to be confused about how to handle absences related to disabilities, as to applying their "no-fault" attendance polici...
person holding up a hand, stop, indoors

NLRB Issues First Unfair Labor Practice Complaint against Non-Competes and Training Repayment

The General Counsel of the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB), former union lawyer Jennifer Abruzzo, continues to attempt to expand th...
ftc front door

Department of Justice's Anti-trust Division Announces Anti-trust Compliance Programs Include Training for Human Resources

There is relatively recent increased attention from government enforcement authorities of anti-trust issues affecting human resource prof...
stylized ai graphic

AI Hiring Bias Is New Focus of EEOC

The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission's (EEOC) Strategy Enforcement Plan for 2024-2028 published in the Federal Register last year ...
old fashio keys, hanging on a ring, attached to a wood board

Keys to Address Employee Dissatisfaction and Activism

We are in a new age of employee dissatisfaction and activism.  There were critical labor shortages during the pandemic, and increased con...
promo graphic, Procedural Accommodations: Efficiently Handling Employer Obligations

Procedural Accommodations: Efficiently Handling Employer Obligations

The ADA and other legislation – both states as well as federal -- often require “reasonable accommodations” in a multiplicity of settings...