Accessibility Tools

Skip to main content

Defenses to Employers from Employee Claiming Infection of the Coronavirus on the Job

Written on .
Tag(s): COVID-19

Employers, along with other establishments all across the country, fear operating under circumstances where employees may claim they became sick with COVID-19 by contracting the Coronavirus at work.  In most states, outside of certain healthcare workers, the federal and state executive orders do not grant any immunity to employers from such claims. 

 

Nevertheless, a study of certain state laws, like Georgia, reveal numerous defenses to an employer should such a claim arise.  The main defense to court liability would be the exclusive remedy provisions of the workers' compensation laws of virtually all of the states.  Under such systems, an employee contending that he or she got injured or sick at work, can only seek compensation by bringing a workers' compensation claim, known as the "exclusive remedy" concept.  Some states have exceptions for willful safety violations, or in some cases for claims against managers and supervisors as opposed to the employer itself. 

Not immediately apparent is that in many states, like Georgia, the exclusive remedy concept prohibits access to the court system for claims, even where the injury or sickness does not result in a compensable recovery under workers' compensation.  In general, for example, in Georgia, diseases are not compensable unless they result from an accident.  Even in those situations where occupational diseases are part of the workers' compensation system, there may be defenses unless the disease "is not an ordinary disease of life to which the general public is exposed," or "is not of a character to which the employee may have had substantial exposure outside of the employment." 

The bottom line is that in a state like Georgia, an employee claiming the acquisition of COVID-19 at work, may be barred from a court claim, and yet also barred from recovery under the workers' compensation system. 

Get Email Updates

Receive newsletters and alerts directly in your email inbox. Sign up below.

Recent Content

ai, human reach out
A January 20, 2026, class action filed against Eightfold AI, Inc. in California is sending shockwaves through the employer and AI community…
danger sign, skull
A second “bombshell” affecting HR pertaining to AI is a federal court ruling in New York, that a defendant’s use of AI in researching and p…
CHAT GPT
Soon after the deciding of the above-discussed case on February 17, 2026, in U.S. v. Heppner, a criminal case in the District Court for the…
avoid, wave away
There are no easy answers to the above question, but some general observations will nevertheless be made.  First, the New York district cou…
ai visualization
Perhaps the starting point is to look at the type of AI platforms generally available.  At a recent conference about AI use for HR, speaker…
june 2026 legal immigration webinar promo graphic
The webinar will cover how to deal with a worksite enforcement action and various types of immigration enforcement activities. The webinar…