Accessibility Tools

Skip to main content

WHILE A SMALL MAJORITY OF AMERICANS FAVOR UNIONS, A MUCH LARGER MAJORITY WOULD VOTE FOR A RIGHT-TO-WORK LAW

Written on .

An interesting and recent Gallup poll conducted in August shows how the American public feels about labor unions, and also about right-to-work (RTW) laws. The poll shows that 53% of Americans approve of labor unions, a figure similar to other union ratings in recent years. The record low approval rating for unions was 48% in 2009.

In contrast, the poll revealed that 71% of Americans would vote for a RTW law if they had the opportunity. Even among Democrats in the poll (who gave unions a 77% approval rating), 65% of the Democrats backed RTW or open shop laws. The poll results among Democrats are interesting in that even though two-thirds of Democrats favor RTW laws, the Democratic Party has been opposed to such laws.

The last time a Gallup poll asked about the opinion of Americans concerning RTW laws was 1957, when the enactment of RTW legislation had only a 62% approval rating, and it was in 1957 that unions received their highest approval rating ever, 75%. In another aspect of the recent Gallup poll, about 35% of respondents said they would like to see labor unions have more influence, while 37% said they would like unions to have less influence.

Currently, 24 states have RTW laws, which give workers the right to not join unions as a condition of employment. A recent study conducted by the Competitive Enterprise Institute addresses an economic analysis of RTW laws on state economies, and ranked states' per capita income loss for not having a RTW law. The study suggests that if non-RTW law states had adopted RTW laws 35 years ago, income levels would be approximately $3,000.00 per person higher today. The total estimated income loss in 2012, according to the study, from the lack of RTW laws was $647.8 billion – more than $2,000.00 for every American.

 

Related Content

Get Email Updates

Receive newsletters and alerts directly in your email inbox. Sign up below.

Recent Content

gavel

Judge Invalidates Joint Employer Rule, and Independent Contractor Rule Takes Effect

The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) Joint Employer Regulation, which was set to take effect March 11, 2024, was invalidated by a Te...
balance of justice statue

The Importance of Fairness in Employment to the Law and to Job Satisfaction

Some of you may have heard about disgruntled employees taping phone conversations of their discharge and mentioning them on social media ...
we the people, focus, document

Major Employers Challenge Constitutionality of Labor Act

Amazon is the most recent major employer to challenge the constitutionality of the National Labor Relations Act (NLRB), joining Trader Jo...
starbucks drink on a table

Starbucks' Big Change in Labor Policies

Starbucks' new public commitment to work with its union antagonists to resolve issues has been called a landmark in labor relations.  In ...
smiling blocks

Judge Orders Survey Data to Be Revealed from Employer EEO-1 Reports

Employers are supposed to file annually the EEO-1, Standard Form 100, with the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL).  This requirement applies ...
mcdonalds sign, blue sky

Featured Article at The Federalist Society: Franchise With That? McDonald’s No-Poach Agreements Receive Antitrust Scrutiny

Elizabeth K. Dorminey authored another article for the Federalist Society. Here's a quick summary of what this article, Franchise With ...