Accessibility Tools

Skip to main content

UNIONS ALSO LOOKING FOR "EMPLOYEES" AMONG COLLEGE ATHLETES

Written on .

In the much publicized case involving Northwestern University football players, the NLRB regional director in Chicago ruled that college players that receive football scholarships to private colleges qualify as employees under the Labor Act because they receive compensation and are subject to the employer's control. Northwestern University, Case 13-RC-121359, 198 LRRM 1837 (3/26/14). The NLRB regional director discussed the time spent on college football, finding that players devote 50-60 hours per week on football-related activities during training camp and 40-50 hours per week during a season. He further found that the players are "under strict and exacting control by their employer throughout the entire year," and that they are essentially paid for their work by a scholarship that covers tuition, fees and room and board worth about $61,000.00 a year. While the ruling is only by an NLRB regional director, and not the NLRB itself, there is certainly a possibility the litigation could drag on for years, and that during the appeal the Board might allow an election among the Northwestern players to unionize. The players indicated they were particularly interested in more money, better protection against injury, the ability to transfer to other schools more easily, and compensation for commercial sponsorships. Other different but related issues are pending in various federal courts, including an anti-trust suit filed by Ed O'Bannon, the former basketball player at UCLA.

It is interesting to note that even the federal government does not recognize the regional director's ruling. In a recent private ruling, the Internal Revenue Service indicated that the NLRB decision does not make the players employees for tax purposes and trigger a tax bill on their athletic scholarships.

The real importance of the Northwestern ruling, as well as other developments covered in this newsletter, is that organized labor is trying to redefine the traditional employer/employee relationship to expand its potential membership.

Related Content

Get Email Updates

Receive newsletters and alerts directly in your email inbox. Sign up below.

Recent Content

The May webinar will be led by Jim Wimberly, and the subject is the current status of the disparate impact theory of discrimination. The EE…
Early morning Bagan, Myanmar
The Trump Administration has acted to terminate TPS status for several countries.  Of course, litigation has followed each notice of termin…
staff
In many situations, employers utilizing staffing companies or other independent contractors to provide workers, enter into contracts with t…
discarded papers
During the Biden administration, a new concept was adopted by the Biden-appointed NLRB in which employers were required to bargain with a u…
be reasonable
In a memo to the NLRB regional offices in late February, NLRB General Counsel Crystal Carey told regional NLRB officials to reduce efforts…
gender neutral bathroom sign
On February 26, 2026, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) ruled that federal employers can lawfully block transgender worker…