Accessibility Tools

Skip to main content

NEW "SILENT RAIDS" CONDUCTED BY ICE

Written on .

According to published reports, the U.S. Immigration Customs Enforcement Agency ("ICE") has sent out some 1,000 notices of immigration audits across the U.S. The large number of notices during September is apparently tied to the close of the end of the government's fiscal year on September 30. The government refuses to release the names of the companies being audited, but reportedly the audits particularly have involved restaurants, food processing, agriculture, and manufacturing. Some say the large number of audits are related, at least in part, to the push in Washington to pass immigration reform legislation.

In such audits, ICE sends a notice of an audit demanding various documents, including I-9 forms, and various payroll lists. After reviewing the documents, ICE issues a "Notice of Suspect Documents" listing suspect workers. Employers receiving such notices are required to notify the workers of their challenge by the government and that they must be terminated unless they show additional legitimate papers. The government is getting increasingly tough on the amount of time it gives the employers to terminate the suspect workers.

Audited employers later receive a second notice indicating the amount of any applicable fines, which can range from $110 to $1,110 per I-9 form, depending on the seriousness of the paperwork errors. Some errors are deemed substantive, while some are deemed procedural. In the latter situation, the employers are given 10 days to correct the errors, the failure of which results in fines.

Many employers erroneously think that simply being on the government's E-Verify system protects them from fines, but that is not the case. In a few cases, there have been substantial criminal fines in addition to the normal penalties, and, in at least two cases, the amount of the penalties have exceeded $1 million. These more expensive situations have occurred where there is potential criminal prosecution for knowingly hiring unauthorized workers.

Related Content

Get Email Updates

Receive newsletters and alerts directly in your email inbox. Sign up below.

Recent Content

Featured Federalist Article: Text Education in Muldrow v. St. Louis: The Supreme Court Just Made Title VII Cases Easier for Plaintiffs to Win

Elizabeth K. Dorminey authored another article for the Federalist Society.  Here's a quick summary of what this article, Supreme Court...
gavel

Judge Invalidates Joint Employer Rule, and Independent Contractor Rule Takes Effect

The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) Joint Employer Regulation, which was set to take effect March 11, 2024, was invalidated by a Te...
balance of justice statue

The Importance of Fairness in Employment to the Law and to Job Satisfaction

Some of you may have heard about disgruntled employees taping phone conversations of their discharge and mentioning them on social media ...
we the people, focus, document

Major Employers Challenge Constitutionality of Labor Act

Amazon is the most recent major employer to challenge the constitutionality of the National Labor Relations Act (NLRB), joining Trader Jo...
starbucks drink on a table

Starbucks' Big Change in Labor Policies

Starbucks' new public commitment to work with its union antagonists to resolve issues has been called a landmark in labor relations.  In ...
smiling blocks

Judge Orders Survey Data to Be Revealed from Employer EEO-1 Reports

Employers are supposed to file annually the EEO-1, Standard Form 100, with the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL).  This requirement applies ...