Accessibility Tools

Skip to main content

You Don’t Like Our Dress Code? You’re Fired!

Written on .

A story that caught my eye this week was about some unpaid interns who were fired en masse for submitting a group proposal protesting the company's "strict" dress code. The situation came to light through an online advice column, Ask A Manager, where one of the interns wrote a letter:

"Even though the division I was hired to work in doesn't deal with clients or customers, there still was a very strict dress code," the (former) intern wrote in the post. "I felt the dress code was overly strict but I wasn't going to say anything, until I noticed one of the workers always wore flat shoes that were made from a fabric other than leather, or running shoes, even though both of these things were contrary to the dress code."

The intern soon learned other interns felt the same way regarding the dress code. After asking managers if they could have some leeway under the dress code, they were told no, despite the other employee being allowed to. So the group rallied together and submitted a proposal to managers and all but one of the intern class signed the petition, which was included with the proposal.

"Our proposal requested that we also be allowed to wear running shoes and non-leather flats, as well as sandals (not flip-flops though) and other non-dress shoes that would fit under a more business casual dress code," the intern wrote. "It was mostly about the footwear, but we also incorporated a request that we not have to wear suits and/or blazers in favor of a more casual, but still professional dress code."

The next day, those who signed the petition were "shocked" after being called into a meeting where they were told as a result of their 'unprofessional' behavior, they were being let go.

After the meeting, the unhappy unemployed interns learned that the worker who was allowed to disobey the dress code was a former soldier who lost her leg and was therefore given permission to wear whatever kind of shoes she could walk in. 

As a management-side labor lawyer, my first thought was: were these interns engaged in protected concerted activity under the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA)? Probably not; there is some Board precedent that unpaid staff are not "employees" under the NLRA.

My second thought was that I was pleased to see that a company was requiring adherence to its written dress code policy but also making an accommodation for a person with a disability. There is no point in having a written policy if you do not require employees to follow it. At the same time, a company must be able to work through the interactive reasonable accommodation process and make adjustments to policies or procedures, when necessary.

To read the entire post: http://www.askamanager.org/2016/06/i-was-fired-from-my-internship-for-writing-a-proposal-for-a-more-flexible-dress-code.html

 

Kathleen J. Jennings
Kathleen J. Jennings
Former Principal

Kathleen J. Jennings is a former principal in the Atlanta office of Wimberly, Lawson, Steckel, Schneider, & Stine, P.C. She defends employers in employment matters, such as sexual harassment, discrimination, Wage and Hour, OSHA, restrictive covenants, and other employment litigation and provides training and counseling to employers in employment matters.

Related Content

Get Email Updates

Receive newsletters and alerts directly in your email inbox. Sign up below.

Recent Content

signing a document on a wooden table indoors

FTC Adopts Rule Banning Non-Compete Agreements

On Tuesday, April 23, 2024, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) voted 3-2, along party lines, to ban most new non-compete agreements and i...
a person in an office working late into the night

US DOL Finalizes Rule to Increase Compensation Thresholds for Overtime Eligibility

Effective July 1, 2024, salaried workers making less than $43,888 annually will be eligible for overtime pay. The salary threshold will i...

Featured Federalist Article: Text Education in Muldrow v. St. Louis: The Supreme Court Just Made Title VII Cases Easier for Plaintiffs to Win

Elizabeth K. Dorminey authored another article for the Federalist Society.  Here's a quick summary of what this article, Supreme Court...
gavel

Judge Invalidates Joint Employer Rule, and Independent Contractor Rule Takes Effect

The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) Joint Employer Regulation, which was set to take effect March 11, 2024, was invalidated by a Te...
balance of justice statue

The Importance of Fairness in Employment to the Law and to Job Satisfaction

Some of you may have heard about disgruntled employees taping phone conversations of their discharge and mentioning them on social media ...
we the people, focus, document

Major Employers Challenge Constitutionality of Labor Act

Amazon is the most recent major employer to challenge the constitutionality of the National Labor Relations Act (NLRB), joining Trader Jo...