Accessibility Tools

Skip to main content

The Latest      —

FEDERAL COURT UPHOLDS NLRB’S QUICKIE ELECTION RULE

Written on .

On June 10, 2016, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the NLRB’s controversial new "quickie election" rule.  Associated Builders and Contractors of Texas, Inc. v. NLRB, No. 15-50497 (C.A. 5, June 10, 2016).  Among other things, the quickie election rule cuts the amount of time between the filing of the request of the election by a union and the election in half, defers employer challenges to voter eligibility issues until after the election, and requires an expanded disclosure of employee contact information to the union.  The appeals court ruled that the NLRB did not exceed its statutory authority in issuing the regulation.  Regarding the new regulatory requirements to turn over employee information including home addresses, available personal email addresses, available home and personal cell numbers of all eligible voters, the court rejected a contention that such provisions are arbitrary and capricious because the rule disregards employees’ privacy concerns, exposes employees to union intimidation and harassment, enables union misuse of the voter lists, and imposes a substantial burden on employers.  The Board also reject an argument that the short time between the filing of the petition and the union election violates free speech and other rights because it is not such a short period as to be arbitrary and capricious. 

Editor’s Note:  It would appear that the quickie election rule is here to stay.  It was first implemented on April 14, 2015.  During the time it has been in effect, the time period between the union’s request for the election and the election itself has dropped from around 40 days to around 24 days.  While the number of union elections has increased, surprisingly the overall number of employees voting in union elections has remained substantially the same.  The union win rate in such elections is very high, almost 70%, but one wonders why more union election petitions are not being filed. 

Related Content

Get Email Updates

Receive newsletters and alerts directly in your email inbox. Sign up below.

Recent Content

Restricted Entry
The Trump Administration has acted to terminate TPS status for several countries. Of course, litigation has followed each notice of termina…
sorry we're closed
For years the Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs (OFCCP) was a formidable enforcer of equal employment and affirmative action a…
birthday sign
Readers may be confused about the significance of the U.S. Supreme Court rulings in Trump v. CASA and related cases, as part of the birthri…
woman looking through a telescope
In the last month of the Biden Administration, the EEOC issued a fact sheet on wearable technology under the anti-discrimination laws, “Wea…
cultural celebration
The concept of company culture is important for most employers.  It is important because it actually constitutes an operating system for em…
trans flag
There have been several recent developments concerning transgender rights.  Most interpret the Supreme Court’s 2020 ruling in Bostock v. Cl…