Accessibility Tools

Skip to main content

FEDERAL COURT UPHOLDS NLRB’S QUICKIE ELECTION RULE

Written on .

On June 10, 2016, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the NLRB’s controversial new "quickie election" rule.  Associated Builders and Contractors of Texas, Inc. v. NLRB, No. 15-50497 (C.A. 5, June 10, 2016).  Among other things, the quickie election rule cuts the amount of time between the filing of the request of the election by a union and the election in half, defers employer challenges to voter eligibility issues until after the election, and requires an expanded disclosure of employee contact information to the union.  The appeals court ruled that the NLRB did not exceed its statutory authority in issuing the regulation.  Regarding the new regulatory requirements to turn over employee information including home addresses, available personal email addresses, available home and personal cell numbers of all eligible voters, the court rejected a contention that such provisions are arbitrary and capricious because the rule disregards employees’ privacy concerns, exposes employees to union intimidation and harassment, enables union misuse of the voter lists, and imposes a substantial burden on employers.  The Board also reject an argument that the short time between the filing of the petition and the union election violates free speech and other rights because it is not such a short period as to be arbitrary and capricious. 

Editor’s Note:  It would appear that the quickie election rule is here to stay.  It was first implemented on April 14, 2015.  During the time it has been in effect, the time period between the union’s request for the election and the election itself has dropped from around 40 days to around 24 days.  While the number of union elections has increased, surprisingly the overall number of employees voting in union elections has remained substantially the same.  The union win rate in such elections is very high, almost 70%, but one wonders why more union election petitions are not being filed. 

Related Content

Get Email Updates

Receive newsletters and alerts directly in your email inbox. Sign up below.

Recent Content

Featured Federalist Article: Text Education in Muldrow v. St. Louis: The Supreme Court Just Made Title VII Cases Easier for Plaintiffs to Win

Elizabeth K. Dorminey authored another article for the Federalist Society.  Here's a quick summary of what this article, Supreme Court...
gavel

Judge Invalidates Joint Employer Rule, and Independent Contractor Rule Takes Effect

The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) Joint Employer Regulation, which was set to take effect March 11, 2024, was invalidated by a Te...
balance of justice statue

The Importance of Fairness in Employment to the Law and to Job Satisfaction

Some of you may have heard about disgruntled employees taping phone conversations of their discharge and mentioning them on social media ...
we the people, focus, document

Major Employers Challenge Constitutionality of Labor Act

Amazon is the most recent major employer to challenge the constitutionality of the National Labor Relations Act (NLRB), joining Trader Jo...
starbucks drink on a table

Starbucks' Big Change in Labor Policies

Starbucks' new public commitment to work with its union antagonists to resolve issues has been called a landmark in labor relations.  In ...
smiling blocks

Judge Orders Survey Data to Be Revealed from Employer EEO-1 Reports

Employers are supposed to file annually the EEO-1, Standard Form 100, with the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL).  This requirement applies ...