Accessibility Tools

Skip to main content

Biden-Harris Administration Attempts to Grant Work Authorization to More Illegal Aliens

Written on .

DHS has announced a new parole in place ("PIP") program that would allow as many as 1,300,000 aliens who have been unlawfully present in the United States for ten or more years to receive a grant of "parole"-without leaving the United States and attempting to come back and apply for admission at a port of entry-if the alien is the spouse or stepchild of a U.S. citizen. See Implementation of Keeping Families Together, 89 Fed. Reg. 67,461 (Aug. 20, 2024). In addition, those who qualify would receive work authorization.

Sixteen states challenged this controversial action by filing a lawsuit against the federal government. State of Texas, et al. v. United States Department of Homeland Security, et al., No. 6:24-cv-00306 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 23, 2024). Texas and the other States seek an injunction to prevent implementation of the PIP program. Texas and the other States contend that longstanding federal law prohibits aliens who entered the United States unlawfully from obtaining most immigration benefits. This includes obtaining lawful permanent resident status-without first leaving the United States and waiting outside the United States for the requisite time-based on an approved family-based or employment-based visa petition. Further, because the parole power may only be exercised to allow an alien to come "into" the United States, it may not be lawfully exercised for aliens already present in the country.

If Texas and the other States obtain the injunction that they seek, implementation of the PIP program should be delayed if not permanently abandoned. If the injunction is denied, employers in the near future may find a new group of potential workers or an existing pool of employees who want to correct their employment records with new names and Social Security numbers.

The court has issued a temporary administrative stay of the PIP program while it considers whether to grant an injunction.

This article is part of our October 2024 Newsletter. 

View newsletter online

Download the newsletter as a PDF

Get Email Updates

Receive newsletters and alerts directly in your email inbox. Sign up below.
promo graphic, Navigating the New Legal Minefield of Automated HR
Artificial Intelligence is changing how businesses hire, manage, and evaluate employees—but it is also creating a new frontier for employme…
stopwatch
In FLSA Opinion Letter 2026-1, the Department of Labor (DOL) addressed whether an employer may reclassify an exempt worker from salaried ex…
gavel, courtroom
In a recent ruling by the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals in Atlanta, the court stated that hostile remarks about other minorities could…
paper books
On January 22, 2026, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) voted 2-1 to rescind its Enforcement Guidance on Harassment in the…
round table
Reports indicate that the new Chief Executive Officer of Walmart, John Furner, in his first company-wide memo since taking over, said he ha…
handshake
When employers attempt to settle disputes involving employment, the circumstances vary greatly as to the formality.  Most employers will no…