Accessibility Tools

Skip to main content

Department of Justice's Anti-trust Division Announces Anti-trust Compliance Programs Include Training for Human Resources

Written on .

There is relatively recent increased attention from government enforcement authorities of anti-trust issues affecting human resource professionals.  In 2016, the Department of Justice (DOJ) and the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) issued their Anti-Trust Guidance for Human Resource Professionals.  At the same time, they issued Anti-Trust Red Flags for Employment Practices.  These guidances set forth that no-poach and wage fixing agreements are per se unlawful under the anti-trust laws.  Red flags included agreements with other companies regarding salary or other compensation, employee benefits, or terms of employment, as well as agreements to refuse to solicit or hire another company's employees, called no-poach agreements.  The guidances went on to suggest that employers should refrain from exchanging company-specific information about employee compensation or other terms of employment with another company, including internal data about employee compensation.  

More recently, at a December 2023 American Bar Association Conference, DOJ's Anti-Trust Division announced that anti-trust compliance programs must include training of human resource professionals on such issues.  An employer having an effective anti-trust compliance program may result in the DOJ declining to prosecute or may reduce penalties of groups that have effective programs.  

The DOJ has largely been unsuccessful prosecuting employers for anti-trust violations in reference to human resource issues.  For example, a 2023 ruling resulted in an acquittal of four managers of an alleged agreement to fix wages and not poach healthcare aids.  A summary judgment of acquittal at the close of the DOJ's case in chief resulted from another no-poach prosecution.  A third no-poach indictment was dropped prior to trial.  In spite of these losses, the DOJ emphasizes it will continue to be aggressive in bringing additional prosecutions, and currently emphasizing corporate compliance programs may be another way to accomplish what it has not been able to accomplish in court.

This article is part of our March 2024 Newsletter. 

View newsletter online

Download the newsletter as a PDF

Get Email Updates

Receive newsletters and alerts directly in your email inbox. Sign up below.
chaotic light lines
On July 10, 2026, E-Verify notified employers that work authorization is extended temporarily through July 24, 2026, for workers from the f…
connected spheres
The U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) announced on April 22, 2026, a new proposed rule clarifying when multiple employers are jointly liable f…
plaintiff sign
The Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) encourages the use and enforcement of arbitration agreements, although the Act contains an exception for…
3
On April 13, 2026, President Trump nominated James Macy to fill the third vacant Republican seat on the National Labor Relations Board (NLR…
deception
An employer official named in a graphic sexual harassment suit brought a counter-claim against her accuser for defamation, calling his alle…
pointing to computer
No personnel issues have been debated longer and more thoroughly than that of the utility of performance reviews.  Some argue that such rev…