Accessibility Tools

Skip to main content

The Latest      —

Employers Should Be Careful Charging Smokers Extra for Health Coverage

Written on .

Federal law allows employer-sponsored health plans to charge smokers a penalty, but the plan will violate the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) if those workers are not given a reasonable alternative to avoid paying the fee. 

One such alternative is participating in a smoker cessation program that complies with certain legal requirements.  Dozens of employers have been sued in recent years over their smoker penalties, resulting in a number of expensive class-wide settlements.  A recent district court ruling offers employers some hope in such situations. Williams v. Bally’s Mgmt. Grp., LLC, 2025 BL 395336 (D.R.I., 11/4/25). 

In this ruling, the employer wasn’t required to retroactively reimburse the tobacco penalties paid by workers who later completed a quit-smoking program.  The court read the Department of Labor (DOL) regulations as only requiring such a reward if the smoker satisfied the alternative standard.  The court refused to follow DOL’s interpretation of the regulations.  The court also addressed whether the company’s disclosures about their tobacco penalty program were sufficient, including whether they tracked the DOL’s sample language.

Editor’s Note: This case addresses contested legal issues and advice of counsel should be sought about such programs.

    This article is part of our December 2025 Newsletter. 

    View the newsletter online

    Download the newsletter as a PDF

    Get Email Updates

    Receive newsletters and alerts directly in your email inbox. Sign up below.
    end of words, pavement
    The Trump Administration has acted to terminate TPS status for several countries.  Of course, litigation has followed each notice of termin…
    we are hiring sign
    The Economist magazine reports that job interviews are “the worst way to select people, except for all the others.”  One of the more encour…
    fighting rams
    Of primary importance is that the best avoidance is to recognize the early warning signs.  In other words, at the beginning of a confrontat…
    shutdown, washington
    A good amount of publicity has come out recently about two major closings that employers blame on their unions.  In the most recent, at the…
    gavel
    In December of 2025, an Oregon federal judge refused Union Pacific’s effort to set aside a $27 million verdict in a suit from the worker al…
    hello
    Discrimination rules applicable to national origin is a priority for the current chairperson of  the Equal Employment Opportunity Commissio…