Accessibility Tools

Skip to main content

Employers Should Be Careful Charging Smokers Extra for Health Coverage

Written on .

Federal law allows employer-sponsored health plans to charge smokers a penalty, but the plan will violate the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) if those workers are not given a reasonable alternative to avoid paying the fee. 

One such alternative is participating in a smoker cessation program that complies with certain legal requirements.  Dozens of employers have been sued in recent years over their smoker penalties, resulting in a number of expensive class-wide settlements.  A recent district court ruling offers employers some hope in such situations. Williams v. Bally’s Mgmt. Grp., LLC, 2025 BL 395336 (D.R.I., 11/4/25). 

In this ruling, the employer wasn’t required to retroactively reimburse the tobacco penalties paid by workers who later completed a quit-smoking program.  The court read the Department of Labor (DOL) regulations as only requiring such a reward if the smoker satisfied the alternative standard.  The court refused to follow DOL’s interpretation of the regulations.  The court also addressed whether the company’s disclosures about their tobacco penalty program were sufficient, including whether they tracked the DOL’s sample language.

Editor’s Note: This case addresses contested legal issues and advice of counsel should be sought about such programs.

    This article is part of our December 2025 Newsletter. 

    View the newsletter online

    Download the newsletter as a PDF

    Get Email Updates

    Receive newsletters and alerts directly in your email inbox. Sign up below.
    ai, human reach out
    A January 20, 2026, class action filed against Eightfold AI, Inc. in California is sending shockwaves through the employer and AI community…
    danger sign, skull
    A second “bombshell” affecting HR pertaining to AI is a federal court ruling in New York, that a defendant’s use of AI in researching and p…
    CHAT GPT
    Soon after the deciding of the above-discussed case on February 17, 2026, in U.S. v. Heppner, a criminal case in the District Court for the…
    avoid, wave away
    There are no easy answers to the above question, but some general observations will nevertheless be made.  First, the New York district cou…
    ai visualization
    Perhaps the starting point is to look at the type of AI platforms generally available.  At a recent conference about AI use for HR, speaker…
    june 2026 legal immigration webinar promo graphic
    The webinar will cover how to deal with a worksite enforcement action and various types of immigration enforcement activities. The webinar…