Employers Should Be Careful Charging Smokers Extra for Health Coverage
Federal law allows employer-sponsored health plans to charge smokers a penalty, but the plan will violate the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) if those workers are not given a reasonable alternative to avoid paying the fee.
One such alternative is participating in a smoker cessation program that complies with certain legal requirements. Dozens of employers have been sued in recent years over their smoker penalties, resulting in a number of expensive class-wide settlements. A recent district court ruling offers employers some hope in such situations. Williams v. Bally’s Mgmt. Grp., LLC, 2025 BL 395336 (D.R.I., 11/4/25).
In this ruling, the employer wasn’t required to retroactively reimburse the tobacco penalties paid by workers who later completed a quit-smoking program. The court read the Department of Labor (DOL) regulations as only requiring such a reward if the smoker satisfied the alternative standard. The court refused to follow DOL’s interpretation of the regulations. The court also addressed whether the company’s disclosures about their tobacco penalty program were sufficient, including whether they tracked the DOL’s sample language.
Editor’s Note: This case addresses contested legal issues and advice of counsel should be sought about such programs.
This article is part of our December 2025 Newsletter.
View the newsletter online
Download the newsletter as a PDF
Related Content
Get Email Updates

FCRA Litigation Challenges Employers’ Use of AI Hiring Platforms

The Dangers of Employers Using AI Research Tools as to Discovery Requests from Plaintiffs

Two Subsequent Cases Protect Defendant’s Use of AI as Subject to Work-product Protection

Is There Anything an Employer Can Do to Avoid Waiving Privileges in Using AI Research Tools?

Suggestions on Use of AI
