Accessibility Tools

Skip to main content

Federal Judge Denies Arbitration in Entire Case Where the Employer Failed to Exempt Sex Harassment Claim from Arbitration

Written on .

The Ending Forced Arbitration of Sexual Assault and Sexual Harassment Act of 2021 (EFAA) barred arbitration agreement provisions that required employees to arbitrate sexual assault/harassment claims.  Most thought this law would simply remove those particular claims from overbroad arbitration agreements while allowing other claims in the case to proceed to arbitration.  However, a New York federal judge has applied the law very broadly, by ruling: "The Court construes the EFAA to render an arbitration clause unenforceable as to the entire case involving a viably pled sexual harassment dispute, as opposed to merely the claims in the case that pertain to the alleged sexual harassment."  Johnson v. Everyrealm, Inc. (S.D. N.Y, 2023).

Editor's Note - Plaintiff lawyers favor court litigation over arbitration because they believe that juries offer a better potential for sympathetic and large plaintiff verdicts.  This court ruling makes it likely that plaintiffs' lawyers across the country will try to add some type of sexual assault/harassment claim in court filings where they are aware that the employer has arbitration agreements requiring arbitration of employment claims.  Plaintiffs' lawyers may attempt to add frivolous sexual harassment claims to more viable claims in order to try to evade enforcement of a mandatory arbitration agreement for the entire lawsuit. 

It is likely that the Johnson case will be appealed and possibly reversed, because courts have interpreted the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) to strongly favor upholding arbitration agreements.  This decision nevertheless represents a danger to employers wanting to enforce mandatory arbitration agreements.  Employers should expedite the review and amendment of their employment agreements to expressly exempt sex assault/harassment cases from the mandatory arbitration process.  This will ensure that claims not involving sexual assault/harassment can proceed to individual arbitration rather than ending up in court and a potential jury ruling. 

This article is part of our May 2023 Newsletter.

View newsletter online

Download the newsletter as a PDF

Get Email Updates

Receive newsletters and alerts directly in your email inbox. Sign up below.
hurt woman hiding behind a smiling sign

What Happens When an Employee Engages in Abusive Conduct in the Course of Union or Concerted Activity?

For many years, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) has been dealing - and struggling - with the above issue.  As an example, racia...
close up of a flag

Litigation over Civil Rights or Patriotic-Related Paraphernalia at Work Continues

Cases continue to arise dealing with the wearing of social/political/patriotic shirts and decals at work.  In a January ruling, Whole Foo...
letters in a pyramind, government

Government Assistance Better than Work for Many

Many wonder why at least 3 million fewer Americans are at work today than there were in 2019.  Economic rationality is one reason.  In so...
pink medical mask on blue background

The COVID-19 Emergency Is Over — Now What?

Now that the Biden administration has implemented its plan to officially end both the national emergency and public health emergency on M...

The Dangers of Off-The-Clock Work

One of the most popular wage claims we see in court these days is a claim for back pay - often at overtime rates -- for "off-the-clock" w...
stopping a hand from touching

Federal Judge Denies Arbitration in Entire Case Where the Employer Failed to Exempt Sex Harassment Claim from Arbitration

The Ending Forced Arbitration of Sexual Assault and Sexual Harassment Act of 2021 (EFAA) barred arbitration agreement provisions that req...