Accessibility Tools

Skip to main content

OSHA TAKES CONTROVERSIAL POSITIONS ON TOILET ISSUES AT WORK

Written on .

Many employers may not realize that the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) regulates in some ways the use of toilet facilities at work. There are at least three important issues, the number of toilets, access to toilets, and now, the even more controversial issue of transgender bathroom access.

There are OSHA general industry requirements for the provision of toilet facilities at 29 CFR 1910.141(c). These requirements state that "toilet facilities, in toilet rooms separate for each sex, shall be provided in all places of employment in accordance with Table J-1 [printed below] of this section. The number of facilities to be provided for each sex shall be based on the number of employees of that sex for whom the facilities are furnished."

Number of Employees Minimum Number of Water Closets

  • 1 to 15 1
  • 16 to 35 2
  • 36 to 55 3
  • 56 to 80 4
  • 81 to 110 5
  • 111 to 150 6
  • Over 150 Provide one additional toilet for each 40 employees

OSHA also weighs in on the controversial issue of access to the toilet facilities. In its most recent pronouncement on the subject, OSHA states that it ". . . has consistently interpreted this standard to require employers to allow employees prompt access to sanitary facilities. Further, employers may not impose unreasonable restrictions on employee use of toilet facilities." In the event employees are not provided reasonable access to the toilet facilities, OSHA can argue that those toilets have not been made "available" to employees, although OSHA cases challenging such denial of access are rare.

This newsletter has previously pointed out how the federal government is moving very rapidly on transgender issues [see February, 2015 newsletter]. The latest OSHA guidance on transgender employees and toilet access is entitled "Best Practices - A Guide to Restroom Access for Transgender Workers." It states that authorities on gender issues counsel that it is essential for employees to be able to work in a manner consistent with how they live the rest of their daily lives, based on their "gender identity." "Restricting employees to using only restrooms that are not consistent with their gender identity, or segregating them from other workers by requiring them to use gender-neutral or other specific restrooms, singles those employees out. . . ." It goes on to state: "For example, a person who identifies as a man should be permitted to use men’s restrooms, and a person who identifies as a woman should be permitted to use women’s restrooms."

The "best practices" advocated by OSHA also provide additional options, which employees may choose, but are not required, to use. These include:

  • Single-occupancy gender-neutral (unisex) facilities; and
  • Use of multi-occupant, gender-neutral restroom facilities with lockable single occupant stalls.

OSHA also advises under the model practices that employers not require employees to provide any medical or legal documentation regarding their gender in order to access the restroom that corresponds to their gender identity.

While the OSHA requirements for the provision of toilet facilities have been in place for some time, and are enforceable, the new transgender "best practices" are of doubtful enforceability as far as OSHA is concerned. However, the EEOC has taken the position that denying a transgender employees access to a restroom consistent with their gender identity constitutes sex discrimination under Title VII.

Related Content

Get Email Updates

Receive newsletters and alerts directly in your email inbox. Sign up below.

Recent Content

Featured Federalist Article: Text Education in Muldrow v. St. Louis: The Supreme Court Just Made Title VII Cases Easier for Plaintiffs to Win

Elizabeth K. Dorminey authored another article for the Federalist Society.  Here's a quick summary of what this article, Supreme Court...
gavel

Judge Invalidates Joint Employer Rule, and Independent Contractor Rule Takes Effect

The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) Joint Employer Regulation, which was set to take effect March 11, 2024, was invalidated by a Te...
balance of justice statue

The Importance of Fairness in Employment to the Law and to Job Satisfaction

Some of you may have heard about disgruntled employees taping phone conversations of their discharge and mentioning them on social media ...
we the people, focus, document

Major Employers Challenge Constitutionality of Labor Act

Amazon is the most recent major employer to challenge the constitutionality of the National Labor Relations Act (NLRB), joining Trader Jo...
starbucks drink on a table

Starbucks' Big Change in Labor Policies

Starbucks' new public commitment to work with its union antagonists to resolve issues has been called a landmark in labor relations.  In ...
smiling blocks

Judge Orders Survey Data to Be Revealed from Employer EEO-1 Reports

Employers are supposed to file annually the EEO-1, Standard Form 100, with the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL).  This requirement applies ...