Accessibility Tools

Skip to main content

New "Joint Employer" Federal Rule Proposed

Written on .

The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) has proposed a new federal rule to solve the controversial issue of whether one employer is considered a "joint employer" of another's employees.  Under the proposed rule, an employer may be found to be a joint employer of another employer's employees only if it possesses and exercises substantial, direct and immediate control over the essential terms and conditions of employment and has done so in a manner that is not limited and routine.  Indirect influence and contractual reservations of authority would no longer be sufficient to establish a joint employer relationship.

The proposed rule reflects the NLRB majority's view that the Labor Act's intent is best supported by a joint employer doctrine that does not draw third parties, who have not played an active role in deciding wages, benefits or other essential terms and conditions of employment, into a collective-bargaining relationship for another employer's employees.  The "poster child" for the issues is considered by many to be McDonald's, who is fighting a case in which a complaint alleges it has enough control of the franchisees and their workers to share legal responsibility in an unfair labor practice case.  The concept applies to potentially a large portion of American employers, including those in the GIG economy, and those that rely on contracting or subcontracting out some of their work. 

The bottom line is that the proposed new rule would require companies to exercise substantial, "direct and immediate" control over the most important terms of a worker's job, like discipline or the power to hire and fire, to be considered joint employers.  During the Obama Administration the then-NLRB majority introduced a new standard, under which a business could be considered a joint employer even if its control over another business's employees was only indirect and limited. 

Public comments are invited on all aspects of the proposed rule and must be submitted within sixty (60) days of the notice's publication in the Federal Register on September 14.  Comments may be submitted either electronically to www.regulations.gov, or by mail or hand-delivery to Roxanne Rothschild, Deputy Executive Secretary, National Labor Relations Board, 1015 Half Street, S.E., Washington, D.C.  20570-0001.

Related Content

Get Email Updates

Receive newsletters and alerts directly in your email inbox. Sign up below.

Recent Content

gavel

Judge Invalidates Joint Employer Rule, and Independent Contractor Rule Takes Effect

The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) Joint Employer Regulation, which was set to take effect March 11, 2024, was invalidated by a Te...
balance of justice statue

The Importance of Fairness in Employment to the Law and to Job Satisfaction

Some of you may have heard about disgruntled employees taping phone conversations of their discharge and mentioning them on social media ...
we the people, focus, document

Major Employers Challenge Constitutionality of Labor Act

Amazon is the most recent major employer to challenge the constitutionality of the National Labor Relations Act (NLRB), joining Trader Jo...
starbucks drink on a table

Starbucks' Big Change in Labor Policies

Starbucks' new public commitment to work with its union antagonists to resolve issues has been called a landmark in labor relations.  In ...
smiling blocks

Judge Orders Survey Data to Be Revealed from Employer EEO-1 Reports

Employers are supposed to file annually the EEO-1, Standard Form 100, with the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL).  This requirement applies ...
mcdonalds sign, blue sky

Featured Article at The Federalist Society: Franchise With That? McDonald’s No-Poach Agreements Receive Antitrust Scrutiny

Elizabeth K. Dorminey authored another article for the Federalist Society. Here's a quick summary of what this article, Franchise With ...