Over the last couple of years, more than 150 lawsuits have been filed by employees claiming that their employer's pension plans include poor investment options, charge excessive fees, or otherwise violate fiduciary obligations in prudent management of retirement plans under ERISA. Plan fiduciaries have attempted to defend these cases by arguing that they offer an array of investment options, and that the plan should not be liable for offering poor performing or expensive funds if the plan also offers prudent, inexpensive options. In a unanimous ruling in January, however, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that plan fiduciaries must conduct their own independent evaluation to determine which investments may be prudently included in a plan's menu of options. "If the fiduciaries fail to remove an imprudent investment from the plan within a reasonable time, they breach their duty," Justice Sotomayor said in the Court's opinion. Hughes v. Northwestern University, No. 19-1401, 1/24/22. Justice Sotomayer did say: "The courts must give due regard to the range and reasonable judgments a fiduciary may make based on her experience and expertise."
This is part of our April 2022 Newsletter.
View newsletter online
Download the newsletter as a PDF
Related Content
Issues on DEI from EEOC and DOJ
The Constantly Changing Work Authorization Rules
New Administration Faces Temporary Injunctions against DEI Termination and Firing of NLRB Member
Biden Administration Issues Antitrust Guidelines for Business Activities Affecting Workers
Trump Executive Order Cancels a $17.75 Minimum Wage for Federal Contractors
