Accessibility Tools

Skip to main content

Music at Work Claimed to Create a Hostile Environment

Written on .

According to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, sexually explicit music played in the workplace can create a hostile environment in violation of Title VII.  Harp v. S & S Activewear, LLC, 69 F. 4th 974.  Eight former employees (seven women and one man) charged the warehouse allowed "sexually graphic, violently misogynistic" music to be played loud such that it permeated the workplace.  The workers also claimed that the music encouraged male employees to make sexually explicit remarks, engage in sexually graphic gestures, and the like.  The defense was rejected that the music did not constitute discrimination since all employees were exposed to the music, and that both men and women were offended by it.  The Eleventh Circuit has previously issued a similar ruling, and the Second Circuit has found that a hostile work environment be created where "sexually offensive comments and graffiti" were commonplace.

The lesson from these type rulings in that employers must police their workplace to maintain its appropriateness, and inappropriate behavior or speech that denigrates people on the basis of a protected class potentially create a legally actionable hostile environment claim regardless of whom it offends.  The court particularly found fault that the employer continued to allow the music to be played because managers felt it motivated employees to work harder, and management had ignored complaints from employees related to the music.

This article is part of our February 2024 Newsletter. 

View newsletter online

Download the newsletter as a PDF

Get Email Updates

Receive newsletters and alerts directly in your email inbox. Sign up below.
ai, human reach out
A January 20, 2026, class action filed against Eightfold AI, Inc. in California is sending shockwaves through the employer and AI community…
danger sign, skull
A second “bombshell” affecting HR pertaining to AI is a federal court ruling in New York, that a defendant’s use of AI in researching and p…
CHAT GPT
Soon after the deciding of the above-discussed case on February 17, 2026, in U.S. v. Heppner, a criminal case in the District Court for the…
avoid, wave away
There are no easy answers to the above question, but some general observations will nevertheless be made.  First, the New York district cou…
ai visualization
Perhaps the starting point is to look at the type of AI platforms generally available.  At a recent conference about AI use for HR, speaker…
june 2026 legal immigration webinar promo graphic
The webinar will cover how to deal with a worksite enforcement action and various types of immigration enforcement activities. The webinar…