Accessibility Tools

Skip to main content

What Does the New #MeToo Inspired Law Mean for Business?

Written on .

A rare bipartisan effort has brought us a new federal law that was enacted in response to the #MeToo movement. This new law will prohibit companies from forcing employees to use arbitration, rather than the courts, to resolve cases involving sexual harassment or sexual assault in the workplace.

Why do we need this new law? Many people have complained that forced arbitration tends to unfairly favor businesses and keep these types of claims out of the public eye. Businesses generally favor arbitration over jury trials for a number of reasons, including the cost, length of time to resolve claims, and less emotion influencing the result.

As of the effective date of this law, companies will be unable to enforce written arbitration agreements that require employees or former employees to resolve claims of workplace sexual harassment or sexual assault through the arbitration process. This will make these types of claims much more attractive to the plaintiff’s lawyers because the monetary value of these cases, especially egregious ones, will increase substantially.

Pro Tip: Now is a good time for businesses to review their policies and procedures that prohibit harassment in the workplace. And when is the last time that you have done any harassment prevention training? It is not enough to talk to employees and managers about harassment at orientation and never bring it up again. Rather, your business should be taking regular affirmative steps to prevent workplace harassment.

Kathleen J. Jennings
Former Principal

Kathleen J. Jennings is a former principal in the Atlanta office of Wimberly, Lawson, Steckel, Schneider, & Stine, P.C. She defends employers in employment matters, such as sexual harassment, discrimination, Wage and Hour, OSHA, restrictive covenants, and other employment litigation and provides training and counseling to employers in employment matters.

Get Email Updates

Receive newsletters and alerts directly in your email inbox. Sign up below.

Recent Content

judicial building
In a move anticipated by Court-watchers encouraged by last term’s SEC v. Jarkesy decision, a panel of the Third Circuit Court of Appeals ha…
In April 2025 ICE issued a notice of intent to fine three Denver, Colorado businesses over $8 million following worksite audits that uncove…
In today's litigious environment, proactive compliance is not just good practice—it's essential for survival. This webinar is designed to e…
sand timer
The Trump Administration has acted to terminate TPS status for several countries. Of course, litigation has followed each notice of termina…
honduras
The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has not issued a Federal Register notice to terminate the Temporary Protected Status (TPS) design…
handcuffs, money
President Trump had told federal agencies to consider civil rather than criminal enforcement of their regulations, in an executive order da…