Accessibility Tools

Skip to main content

AI Is Another Relevant Area of Employment Law Issues

Written on .

The use of artificial intelligence (AI) is becoming increasingly utilized, including matters pertaining to employment.  Perhaps the most common related use pertains to the screening of resumes and applications of job applicants.  Some employers have developed sophisticated AI computer algorithms designed to make hiring decisions.  The concept is admirable, in that supposedly computers are less prone to bias, and the hiring process becomes more simple, systematic, and objective.  Unfortunately, the situation is not that simple, and legal risks can be created for employers. 

To begin with, the risk of bias in AI can create a discriminatory hiring system.  The decisions made by AI is dependent upon the information upon which it is trained, and the input can in essence be based on input adversely affecting minority groups, or any group for that matter.  For this reason, the use of AI in connection with employment decisions must be carefully and legally reviewed.  

The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) is increasingly focusing on the AI issue.  In addition, state and local governments are in some cases passing laws restricting employer use of AI.

There has been some federal legislation on the subject, in the 2021 National Defense Authorization Act, which outlines considerations that employers should use in assessing AI.  It is designed to focus on concepts business can use to mitigate risks from AI.  Unfortunately, the principles detailed in the guidance are so vague and abstract to have limited practical use.  One of the more significant points in the guidance is the suggestion to identify all third-party software and data the AI system relies on, a suggestion to allow employers to identify risks.  The framework is coming from the National Institute of Science and Technology and is currently voluntary.  In addition to employment discrimination concerns, other potential issues pertain to privacy concerns and security threats. The guidance at best helps employers identify issues and employers wishing to protect themselves from legal claims may wish to follow the suggested government framework as a defensive measure.  It is highly likely that more government directives will come out on AI during the term of the current administration. 

This article is part of our April 2023 Newsletter.

View newsletter online

Download the newsletter as a PDF

Get Email Updates

Receive newsletters and alerts directly in your email inbox. Sign up below.
hurt woman hiding behind a smiling sign

What Happens When an Employee Engages in Abusive Conduct in the Course of Union or Concerted Activity?

For many years, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) has been dealing - and struggling - with the above issue.  As an example, racia...
close up of a flag

Litigation over Civil Rights or Patriotic-Related Paraphernalia at Work Continues

Cases continue to arise dealing with the wearing of social/political/patriotic shirts and decals at work.  In a January ruling, Whole Foo...
letters in a pyramind, government

Government Assistance Better than Work for Many

Many wonder why at least 3 million fewer Americans are at work today than there were in 2019.  Economic rationality is one reason.  In so...
pink medical mask on blue background

The COVID-19 Emergency Is Over — Now What?

Now that the Biden administration has implemented its plan to officially end both the national emergency and public health emergency on M...

The Dangers of Off-The-Clock Work

One of the most popular wage claims we see in court these days is a claim for back pay - often at overtime rates -- for "off-the-clock" w...
stopping a hand from touching

Federal Judge Denies Arbitration in Entire Case Where the Employer Failed to Exempt Sex Harassment Claim from Arbitration

The Ending Forced Arbitration of Sexual Assault and Sexual Harassment Act of 2021 (EFAA) barred arbitration agreement provisions that req...