Accessibility Tools

Skip to main content

AI Is Another Relevant Area of Employment Law Issues

Written on .

The use of artificial intelligence (AI) is becoming increasingly utilized, including matters pertaining to employment.  Perhaps the most common related use pertains to the screening of resumes and applications of job applicants.  Some employers have developed sophisticated AI computer algorithms designed to make hiring decisions.  The concept is admirable, in that supposedly computers are less prone to bias, and the hiring process becomes more simple, systematic, and objective.  Unfortunately, the situation is not that simple, and legal risks can be created for employers. 

To begin with, the risk of bias in AI can create a discriminatory hiring system.  The decisions made by AI is dependent upon the information upon which it is trained, and the input can in essence be based on input adversely affecting minority groups, or any group for that matter.  For this reason, the use of AI in connection with employment decisions must be carefully and legally reviewed.  

The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) is increasingly focusing on the AI issue.  In addition, state and local governments are in some cases passing laws restricting employer use of AI.

There has been some federal legislation on the subject, in the 2021 National Defense Authorization Act, which outlines considerations that employers should use in assessing AI.  It is designed to focus on concepts business can use to mitigate risks from AI.  Unfortunately, the principles detailed in the guidance are so vague and abstract to have limited practical use.  One of the more significant points in the guidance is the suggestion to identify all third-party software and data the AI system relies on, a suggestion to allow employers to identify risks.  The framework is coming from the National Institute of Science and Technology and is currently voluntary.  In addition to employment discrimination concerns, other potential issues pertain to privacy concerns and security threats. The guidance at best helps employers identify issues and employers wishing to protect themselves from legal claims may wish to follow the suggested government framework as a defensive measure.  It is highly likely that more government directives will come out on AI during the term of the current administration. 

This article is part of our April 2023 Newsletter.

View newsletter online

Download the newsletter as a PDF

Related Content

Get Email Updates

Receive newsletters and alerts directly in your email inbox. Sign up below.
From the historic bronze doors at Los Angeles City Hall.

NLRB to Seek Rescission of past Discipline Imposed under Overbroad Employer Work Rules

In a memo issued during April, NLRB General Counsel Jennifer Abruzzo announced that when the NLRB seeks to rescind overbroad and thus ill...

Do Drive Cam Cameras inside Trucks Violate Employee Rights?

As a safety measure, many employers with driver employees have installed cameras inside the cab to alert drivers and monitor their safe d...
amazon app, mobile phone, table, indoors

Amazon Considers Risk When Investigating Employee Misconduct

In a legal conference in March, Amazon Corporate Counsel Lee Langston stated that aggressive enforcement actions of the NLRB have impacte...
Person signing a contract

Latest NLRB Attack Goes beyond Non-Compete Agreements to Reach Outside Employment

An interesting article concludes that the NLRB is invalidating employer rules "one clause at a time."  On January 31, 2024, the NLRB's Di...
black lives matter painted on a wall

NLRB Board Addresses BLM Insignia at Work

In a February 21, 2024 ruling, the NLRB reversed an administrative law judge's conclusion that writing "Black Lives Matter" (BLM) on apro...
indoors, workplace

Walk-Around Rule Allowing Union Reps to Accompany Safety Inspectors to Go into Effect

The U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) released its "Walk-Around Rule" in April, to take effect on May 31, 2024.  ...