Accessibility Tools

Skip to main content

Labor Board to Reconsider Employer Restrictions on Wearing Buttons and Other Insignia in the Workplace

Written on .

Many employers do not like the idea of employees wearing pro-union shirts or buttons on the job. In the past, however, and particularly during the Obama Administration, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) gave employees a great deal of rights to wear union buttons and other buttons pertaining to concerted activities. More current issues concern the wearing of buttons for Black Lives Matter or other political buttons. 

Now, in a case involving Tesla, the NLRB has invited the public to submit briefs on the issue of whether the company violated the labor laws by prohibiting employees from wearing union shirts. An administrative law judge had ruled that Tesla's apparel policy was not justified by "special circumstances" to maintain production or discipline. Tesla argued that the special-circumstances standard did not apply because the employees had not been prohibited from wearing union stickers and hats, but were simply required to wear special "teamwear" Tesla shirts. A previous NLRB ruling during the Obama Administration had said employers cannot get around the special circumstances test by mandating uniforms or other clothing in the workplace that prevents employees from wearing apparel with union insignia.  

Thus, the three remaining Republican members of the NLRB asked for public comment on the appropriate standard for employers with a nondiscriminatory uniform policy that implicitly allows employees to wear union insignias. The deadline for filing such briefs was in March, and perhaps the existing Republican majority wants to issue a ruling before one of the Republican member's term expires in late August.

This is part of our August 2021 Newsletter.

Click here to download the newsletter PDF

Related Content

Get Email Updates

Receive newsletters and alerts directly in your email inbox. Sign up below.

Recent Content

Featured Federalist Article: Text Education in Muldrow v. St. Louis: The Supreme Court Just Made Title VII Cases Easier for Plaintiffs to Win

Elizabeth K. Dorminey authored another article for the Federalist Society.  Here's a quick summary of what this article, Supreme Court...
gavel

Judge Invalidates Joint Employer Rule, and Independent Contractor Rule Takes Effect

The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) Joint Employer Regulation, which was set to take effect March 11, 2024, was invalidated by a Te...
balance of justice statue

The Importance of Fairness in Employment to the Law and to Job Satisfaction

Some of you may have heard about disgruntled employees taping phone conversations of their discharge and mentioning them on social media ...
we the people, focus, document

Major Employers Challenge Constitutionality of Labor Act

Amazon is the most recent major employer to challenge the constitutionality of the National Labor Relations Act (NLRB), joining Trader Jo...
starbucks drink on a table

Starbucks' Big Change in Labor Policies

Starbucks' new public commitment to work with its union antagonists to resolve issues has been called a landmark in labor relations.  In ...
smiling blocks

Judge Orders Survey Data to Be Revealed from Employer EEO-1 Reports

Employers are supposed to file annually the EEO-1, Standard Form 100, with the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL).  This requirement applies ...