Accessibility Tools

Skip to main content

Biden's Labor Policy Showing up in Anti-Trust Enforcement

Written on .

The pro-labor and pro-union philosophy of President Biden is making its mark in anti-trust enforcement.  In a 2021 executive order dealing with promoting competition, special emphasis was given to anti-trust issues in labor.  In fact, the issues arising in labor markets was first of the anti-trust policy objectives in the anti-trust executive order.  The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and the Department of Justice (DOJ) used this approach in their recent actions.

The most recent manifestation of this policy is the FTC's proposed rulemaking to curtail non-compete clauses and other clauses or agreements that may limit worker mobility.  Enforcement has also increased in wage-fixing and no-poach situations.  In the latter situations, enforcement authorities generally have to show the effect on the relevant labor market.  While past emphasis was on wage-fixing and no-poach situations involving highly skilled employees, the newer approach also focuses on low-wage workers.  For example, in a case involving a meat company, the DOJ argued that the ability to endure more difficult working conditions was worker-differentiating, thus allowing harm to competitive conditions to be shown in a more narrow defined market.  The President's executive order also requires the DOJ to consider whether to revise the Anti-Trust Guidance for Human Resource Professionals of October 2016 to "better protect workers from wage collusion."  The DOJ has already signaled its intent to reconsider part of its Anti-Trust Guidance for Human Resource Professionals.  One of those areas that may be of interest concerns limitations on exchanging competitively sensitive information through a third party, even if the data was anonymized, aggregated and historical.  

Ironically, in other ways the Biden Administration in practice promotes less competition in labor markets, seemingly inconsistent with its pro-competition approach in general.  Examples include prevailing wage determinations, project labor agreements in the construction industry, and government contracting rules in a variety of industries.  These pro-union or pro-labor measures lead to less competition, not more.  The same concept shows up in the federal government's inflation-fighting mechanisms.  The most dangerous form of inflation is wage-price spirals, in which higher wages bring on higher prices which in turn brings on more inflation.  The federal government's policy of higher interest rates and the like is an attempt to decrease workers' bargaining power, thus allowing lower wages and lower inflation.

This article is part of our April 2023 Newsletter.

View newsletter online

Download the newsletter as a PDF

Get Email Updates

Receive newsletters and alerts directly in your email inbox. Sign up below.
hurt woman hiding behind a smiling sign

What Happens When an Employee Engages in Abusive Conduct in the Course of Union or Concerted Activity?

For many years, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) has been dealing - and struggling - with the above issue.  As an example, racia...
close up of a flag

Litigation over Civil Rights or Patriotic-Related Paraphernalia at Work Continues

Cases continue to arise dealing with the wearing of social/political/patriotic shirts and decals at work.  In a January ruling, Whole Foo...
letters in a pyramind, government

Government Assistance Better than Work for Many

Many wonder why at least 3 million fewer Americans are at work today than there were in 2019.  Economic rationality is one reason.  In so...
pink medical mask on blue background

The COVID-19 Emergency Is Over — Now What?

Now that the Biden administration has implemented its plan to officially end both the national emergency and public health emergency on M...

The Dangers of Off-The-Clock Work

One of the most popular wage claims we see in court these days is a claim for back pay - often at overtime rates -- for "off-the-clock" w...
stopping a hand from touching

Federal Judge Denies Arbitration in Entire Case Where the Employer Failed to Exempt Sex Harassment Claim from Arbitration

The Ending Forced Arbitration of Sexual Assault and Sexual Harassment Act of 2021 (EFAA) barred arbitration agreement provisions that req...