Accessibility Tools

Skip to main content

Administration Announces New DACA Rule

Written on .

The Deferred Action for Childhood Arrival Programs (DACA), begun in 2012, offers the ability to work legally to some 600,000 undocumented persons who came to the U.S. as children.  The Obama-era rule has been under legal attack and a court in Texas ruled the program was illegal and barred the federal government from accepting new applicants, although it permitted existing DACA recipients to continue relying on its protections.  The judge stated, however, that the program wasn't properly implemented, and a new regulation was created to alleviate that concern, although it will not address all the court's concerns.  The new rule would apply only to DACA renewal requests, not to new applications which are currently on hold pending the litigation.  It takes effect on October 31, 2022.  The program would continue to grant two years of deportation protection and a two-year work permit for a $495 fee.  It will continue to apply only to people who came to the U.S. as children and have continuously lived in the country since 2007.  The legality of the entire concept of DACA is still pending before the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, which is weighing whether the Department of Homeland Security has authority to establish broad enforcement exceptions like DACA at all.

On October 5, 2022, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit upheld the ruling that President Obama's program of Deferred Action for Child Arrivals (DACA) was illegal.  The court ruled that the Obama Administration's 2012 memo creating the policy exceeded its statutory power and violated the Administrative Procedures Act.  Since the Biden Administration in August issued a final rule attempting to maintain DACA, the Fifth Circuit opinion allows Dreamers to renew that status while litigation on the issue continues in the district court. 

This article is part of our November 2022 Newsletter.

View newsletter online

Download the newsletter as a PDF

Related Content

Get Email Updates

Receive newsletters and alerts directly in your email inbox. Sign up below.

Featured Federalist Article: Text Education in Muldrow v. St. Louis: The Supreme Court Just Made Title VII Cases Easier for Plaintiffs to Win

Elizabeth K. Dorminey authored another article for the Federalist Society.  Here's a quick summary of what this article, Supreme Court...
gavel

Judge Invalidates Joint Employer Rule, and Independent Contractor Rule Takes Effect

The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) Joint Employer Regulation, which was set to take effect March 11, 2024, was invalidated by a Te...
balance of justice statue

The Importance of Fairness in Employment to the Law and to Job Satisfaction

Some of you may have heard about disgruntled employees taping phone conversations of their discharge and mentioning them on social media ...
we the people, focus, document

Major Employers Challenge Constitutionality of Labor Act

Amazon is the most recent major employer to challenge the constitutionality of the National Labor Relations Act (NLRB), joining Trader Jo...
starbucks drink on a table

Starbucks' Big Change in Labor Policies

Starbucks' new public commitment to work with its union antagonists to resolve issues has been called a landmark in labor relations.  In ...
smiling blocks

Judge Orders Survey Data to Be Revealed from Employer EEO-1 Reports

Employers are supposed to file annually the EEO-1, Standard Form 100, with the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL).  This requirement applies ...