Accessibility Tools

Skip to main content

EEOC Required to Pay Employer Almost $2 Million in Legal Fees

Written on .

In September, a federal judge ruled that the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission ("EEOC") must pay an employer almost $2 million in legal fees for pursing class sexual harassment claims against a company that it knew or should have known were frivolous.  EEOC v. SRST Van Expedited, Inc., No. 07-CV-95 (N.D. Iowa, 9/22/17).  The EEOC had claimed that the company had engaged in the pattern or practice of discrimination against female truck drivers and trainees who were sexually harassed.  The judge making the award rejected the EEOC’s argument that claims against the employer did not have the sufficient "preclusive" effect on potential future legal action by the agency against the company for it to be deemed the prevailing party under Title VII.  However, the judge did reduce a previous award from approximately $4.5 million because not all of the EEOC claims were deemed frivolous. 

Get Email Updates

Receive newsletters and alerts directly in your email inbox. Sign up below.
sand timer
President Trump has nominated Boeing Chief Labor Counsel Scott Mayer, and long-time NLRB official James Murphy, for positions on the Nation…
thermometer
On July 24, 2025, the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) announced several programs designed to help employers and others voluntarily assess an…
open sign
EEO-1 reports, also known as Standard Form 100, are required annually from employers of 100 or more employees and of federal contractor wor…
shotgun shell
The Wall Street Journal recently did an interesting article on the latest training for best practices in active-shooter situations.  It beg…
religious symbol
On July 18, the U.S. Office of Personnel Management outlined a new policy in a memorandum titled “Protecting Religious Expression in the Fe…
promo graphic, New Rules for Religious Discrimination and Accommodation In the Workplace
The First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution states that “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibitin…