Accessibility Tools

Skip to main content

HOW TO MANAGE THE RETURN OF SOCIAL SECURITY NO-MATCH LETTERS

Written on .

Social Security "no-match" letters generate a great deal of concern in the employer community as to how to handle such issues.  Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) has in the past taken the position that receipt of one of these notifications creates an affirmative duty to investigate and potentially take action, at least to avoid a potential finding of constructive knowledge of illegal employment.  On the other hand, the Immigration and Employee Rights Section (IER) of the Department of Justice has strict rules as to whether employers are going too far in their employment verification duties.  At one time, federal regulations provided a safe harbor procedure for handling these issues, but the Obama Administration rescinded the regulation and suspended the issuance of Social Security mis-match letters in 2012.  Thus, this year will be the first time in seven years that employers will receive Social Security no-match letters when the government has discovered that the W-2 records submitted by the employer do not match the government's records on employee names and Social Security numbers (SSNs).

In the past, ICE has taken the position that an employer must take affirmative action upon discovering a Social Security discrepancy, but the discrepancy is only "evidence" of constructive knowledge of unauthorized employment.  In 2011, the predecessor to IER provided specific "dos and don'ts" related to no-match letters.  The most important suggestions in the IER guidance are as follows: 

DO:    

DON'T:

1.  Check the reported no-match information against your personnel records.

1.  Use the receipt of a no-match notice alone as a basis to terminate, suspend or take other adverse action against the employee.

2.  Inform the employee of the no-match notice and ask the employee to confirm the name/SSN reflected in your personnel records.

2.  Attempt to immediately reverify the employee's employment eligibility by requesting the completion of a new I-9 form based solely on the no-match notice. 

3.  Advise the employee to contact the SSA to correct and/or update SSA records.

3.  Follow different procedures for different classes of employees based on national origin or citizenship status.

4.  Give the employee a reasonable period of time (no specific time period is listed) to address a reported no-match with the local SSA office.

4.  Require the employee to produce specific I-9 documents to address the no-match.

5.  Periodically meet with or otherwise contact the employee to learn and document the status of the employee's efforts to address and resolve the no-match.

5.  Require the employee to provide written evidence from SSA that the no-match has been resolved.

6.  Submit any employer or employee corrections to the SSA.

 

SSA began issuing letters called Employer Correction Requests in March 2019.  These letters do not include the names or SSNs of employees.  Instead, the letters ask employer to register online with SSA's business services unit to obtain the no-match information.

Editor's Note:  The author recently had a review by IER of a client's immigration practices.  IER pressed our client to avoid any type of adverse action against their employees solely because of a no-match letter.  This position leaves employers in the dark as to what they should do.  In general, employers must investigate, at least to show some responsive action.  They would not necessarily have to terminate each employee that is the subject of a no-match.  Note that ICE audits normally request employer records concerning no-match letters.  The big issue is when or if an employer is required to terminate an employee who has failed to show a correction of the mismatch issue by the SSA.  There appear to be more Social Security mismatches than there are unauthorized immigrants, and multiple reports of a mismatch often involve the same Social Security number.  The mismatch notices themselves have often disclaimed reliance on them as the sole basis to terminate an employee.  Further, SSA itself often takes 120 days and sometimes more to correct a mismatch.

In this situation, employers need legal counsel as to what approach to take when no confirmation from SSA of a correction is received.  A reasonable option is to give employees plenty of time to confirm the correction, such as 60 to 120 days, and another controversial option is to allow employees to provide other identity and work authorization documents sufficient to complete a new I-9 form in appropriate situations.

Related Content

Get Email Updates

Receive newsletters and alerts directly in your email inbox. Sign up below.

Recent Content

Featured Federalist Article: Text Education in Muldrow v. St. Louis: The Supreme Court Just Made Title VII Cases Easier for Plaintiffs to Win

Elizabeth K. Dorminey authored another article for the Federalist Society.  Here's a quick summary of what this article, Supreme Court...
gavel

Judge Invalidates Joint Employer Rule, and Independent Contractor Rule Takes Effect

The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) Joint Employer Regulation, which was set to take effect March 11, 2024, was invalidated by a Te...
balance of justice statue

The Importance of Fairness in Employment to the Law and to Job Satisfaction

Some of you may have heard about disgruntled employees taping phone conversations of their discharge and mentioning them on social media ...
we the people, focus, document

Major Employers Challenge Constitutionality of Labor Act

Amazon is the most recent major employer to challenge the constitutionality of the National Labor Relations Act (NLRB), joining Trader Jo...
starbucks drink on a table

Starbucks' Big Change in Labor Policies

Starbucks' new public commitment to work with its union antagonists to resolve issues has been called a landmark in labor relations.  In ...
smiling blocks

Judge Orders Survey Data to Be Revealed from Employer EEO-1 Reports

Employers are supposed to file annually the EEO-1, Standard Form 100, with the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL).  This requirement applies ...