Accessibility Tools

Skip to main content

The Latest      —

Lessons in Applying The Pregnancy Act to Light Duty Jobs

Written on .

Many employers limit light duty jobs to workers who have suffered work-related injuries.  However, a new case out of the Eleventh Circuit tells us that the employer that fails to offer these light duty jobs to pregnant employees with medical restrictions risks being liable for discrimination.  Durham v. Rural/Metro Corp., 18-14687 (11th Cir., 4/17/20). 

 

The employer apparently thought it was on safe ground limiting the light duty jobs to those with workers who had suffered work-related injuries.  However, when a plaintiff sued under the Pregnancy Discrimination Act (PDA), the Eleventh Circuit determined the issue as whether the employer accommodated others who were not pregnant but were "similar in their ability or inability to work" to the plaintiff.  The court went on to find that the pregnant plaintiff's temporary inability to lift more than 50 pounds and her colleagues inability to lift more than 10 or 20 pounds rendered her and her colleagues injured on the job equally unable to perform the 100-pound lifting duties.  Having found that the pregnant plaintiff and her colleagues who were injured on the job were "similar in their ability or inability to work," the court concluded that the employer would be deemed to have discriminated against the pregnant plaintiff unless it could show a legitimate, non-discriminatory reason for treating the pregnant employee differently from non-pregnant employees. 

Editor's Note - The bottom line is that the case law increasingly suggests that employers need to treat employees with pregnancy-related medical restrictions similarly to other employees with medical restrictions when it comes to making accommodations at work.

Related Content

Get Email Updates

Receive newsletters and alerts directly in your email inbox. Sign up below.

Recent Content

Restricted Entry
The Trump Administration has acted to terminate TPS status for several countries. Of course, litigation has followed each notice of termina…
sorry we're closed
For years the Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs (OFCCP) was a formidable enforcer of equal employment and affirmative action a…
birthday sign
Readers may be confused about the significance of the U.S. Supreme Court rulings in Trump v. CASA and related cases, as part of the birthri…
woman looking through a telescope
In the last month of the Biden Administration, the EEOC issued a fact sheet on wearable technology under the anti-discrimination laws, “Wea…
cultural celebration
The concept of company culture is important for most employers.  It is important because it actually constitutes an operating system for em…
trans flag
There have been several recent developments concerning transgender rights.  Most interpret the Supreme Court’s 2020 ruling in Bostock v. Cl…