Accessibility Tools

Skip to main content

THOUGHTS ON THE NEW SECRETARY OF LABOR AND THE EFFECT ON EMPLOYERS

Written on .

One day after President Trump’s first nominee for Secretary of Labor withdrew, the President announced that Alexander Acosta would be his new Labor Secretary - Designate.  The prior Labor Secretary - Designate, Andy Pudzer, had been the President’s perhaps most controversial appointment to the Cabinet.  Not only was he president of various fast-food restaurant chains, but he was a highly-publicized advocate of management rights.  In response, Democrats made him their primary target for opposition and an almost a "perfect storm" of adverse publicity caused even several Republican senators to have doubts.  In this environment, on February 15, Pudzer withdrew his nomination and a day later the President appointed a person who is widely considered a "safe" nominee. 

It is hard for anyone to say anything bad about Alexander Acosta.  He is Hispanic and has been confirmed by the U.S. Senate three times in prior positions as a member (for eight months) of the National Labor Relations Board, as Assistant Attorney General for Civil Rights, and as a U.S. attorney for the Southern District of Florida.  He is Harvard-educated and is currently the law school dean at Florida International University.  He has even been a former law clerk for Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito.

Both Republicans and Democrats have praised the nomination, and even organized labor has been somewhat supportive.   Most commentators consider him a deep thinker and an intellectual, and he is likely to be affirmed by the Senate which is currently on recess through February 27.

How should employers react to the nomination of Acosta?  In general, employers looked upon the prior nominee, Pudzer, as a leader and a "firebrand" for management rights.  Many aggressive measures in support of management were expected.  Acosta, on the other hand, is expected to move much slower to build more of a consensus, and to be more of a moderate.  Such an approach is not all bad, however, as his changes are much less likely to generate the intense opposition that would have developed to anything Pudzer attempted.

Related Content

Get Email Updates

Receive newsletters and alerts directly in your email inbox. Sign up below.

Recent Content

person staning next to someone in a wheelchair, outdoors

"No-Fault" Attendance Policy Upheld against Disability Claims

Employers continue to be confused about how to handle absences related to disabilities, as to applying their "no-fault" attendance polici...
person holding up a hand, stop, indoors

NLRB Issues First Unfair Labor Practice Complaint against Non-Competes and Training Repayment

The General Counsel of the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB), former union lawyer Jennifer Abruzzo, continues to attempt to expand th...
ftc front door

Department of Justice's Anti-trust Division Announces Anti-trust Compliance Programs Include Training for Human Resources

There is relatively recent increased attention from government enforcement authorities of anti-trust issues affecting human resource prof...
stylized ai graphic

AI Hiring Bias Is New Focus of EEOC

The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission's (EEOC) Strategy Enforcement Plan for 2024-2028 published in the Federal Register last year ...
old fashio keys, hanging on a ring, attached to a wood board

Keys to Address Employee Dissatisfaction and Activism

We are in a new age of employee dissatisfaction and activism.  There were critical labor shortages during the pandemic, and increased con...
promo graphic, Procedural Accommodations: Efficiently Handling Employer Obligations

Procedural Accommodations: Efficiently Handling Employer Obligations

The ADA and other legislation – both states as well as federal -- often require “reasonable accommodations” in a multiplicity of settings...