DANCERS SUE EMPLOYER CLAIMING RECLASSIFICATION AS EMPLOYEES WAS RETALIATION
Employers are well aware of classification issues as to whether workers are employees or independent contractors. Use of independent contractors offers great advantages to employers, including saving of payroll taxes and the avoidance of union and employment claims. On the other hand, there is widespread litigation over misclassification issues.
One employer recently received the worst of both worlds. A class of exotic dancers in California sued their employer alleging their reclassification as employees and related reduction of pay was in retaliation for their previous lawsuit. Although the employer contended it was required to reclassify the dancers as a result of a California Supreme Court ruling, the dancers contended that the employer was not required to reduce their pay in the process. The case is Jane Loes 1-3 v. SFBSC Management LLC, Cal. Super. Ct., complaint filed 1/29/19.
Editor's Note: This lawsuit, if valid, puts employers in a "damned if you do, damned if you don't" situation. The lesson to be learned from the case is that hard facts may make bad law, and that employers should seek competent employment counsel in carrying out such reclassifications.
Related Content
Get Email Updates
Recent Content

FCRA Litigation Challenges Employers’ Use of AI Hiring Platforms

The Dangers of Employers Using AI Research Tools as to Discovery Requests from Plaintiffs

Two Subsequent Cases Protect Defendant’s Use of AI as Subject to Work-product Protection

Is There Anything an Employer Can Do to Avoid Waiving Privileges in Using AI Research Tools?

Suggestions on Use of AI
