Accessibility Tools

Skip to main content

NLRB Administrative Law Judge Rules against Non-Compete and Solicitation Clauses under Labor Act

Written on .

On June 13, 2024, an NLRB administrative law judge ruled that J.O. Mory, Inc. violated the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) by maintaining unlawful non-compete and solicitation policies.  The judge explained that the non-compete agreement would cause a reasonable employee to refrain from engaging in protected activities because if an employee knows they are barred from being involved with a company that operates a similar business to the employer, they will be more fearful of being fired and less willing to rock the boat, as they face the prospect of being unable to find any work in their geographic area if they are fired or forced to leave their job.  The provisions prohibiting employees from soliciting their co-workers to leave the employer and requiring that employees disclose solicitations to the employer also interfere with protected activities, like telling co-workers about union benefits, participating in and recruiting others to work at another employer in an effort to unionize, and making concerted threats to quit.  The judge ordered the employer to cease and desist from enforcing the unlawful activity and offer reinstatement to the unlawfully terminated employees, making them whole for loss of earnings and financial harm suffered.  

Editor's Note:  The NLRB General Counsel has been advocating this type result, but this is the first NLRB ruling on the subject, although it comes from an administrative law judge rather than the Board itself.  The NLRB issued a press release on this case, suggesting its importance to the Board.  It should be noted that the case was analyzed under the concept of overbroad policies, but an employer will find difficulty drafting more narrow rules to comply with this doctrine.  The full Board will undoubtedly review this case, but the current makeup of the Board seems to support almost any doctrine that favors union organizing. 

This article is part of our August 2024 Newsletter. 

View newsletter online

Download the newsletter as a PDF

Get Email Updates

Receive newsletters and alerts directly in your email inbox. Sign up below.
promo graphic, Navigating the New Legal Minefield of Automated HR
Artificial Intelligence is changing how businesses hire, manage, and evaluate employees—but it is also creating a new frontier for employme…
stopwatch
In FLSA Opinion Letter 2026-1, the Department of Labor (DOL) addressed whether an employer may reclassify an exempt worker from salaried ex…
gavel, courtroom
In a recent ruling by the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals in Atlanta, the court stated that hostile remarks about other minorities could…
paper books
On January 22, 2026, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) voted 2-1 to rescind its Enforcement Guidance on Harassment in the…
round table
Reports indicate that the new Chief Executive Officer of Walmart, John Furner, in his first company-wide memo since taking over, said he ha…
handshake
When employers attempt to settle disputes involving employment, the circumstances vary greatly as to the formality.  Most employers will no…