Accessibility Tools

Skip to main content

NLRB Administrative Law Judge Rules against Non-Compete and Solicitation Clauses under Labor Act

Written on .

On June 13, 2024, an NLRB administrative law judge ruled that J.O. Mory, Inc. violated the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) by maintaining unlawful non-compete and solicitation policies.  The judge explained that the non-compete agreement would cause a reasonable employee to refrain from engaging in protected activities because if an employee knows they are barred from being involved with a company that operates a similar business to the employer, they will be more fearful of being fired and less willing to rock the boat, as they face the prospect of being unable to find any work in their geographic area if they are fired or forced to leave their job.  The provisions prohibiting employees from soliciting their co-workers to leave the employer and requiring that employees disclose solicitations to the employer also interfere with protected activities, like telling co-workers about union benefits, participating in and recruiting others to work at another employer in an effort to unionize, and making concerted threats to quit.  The judge ordered the employer to cease and desist from enforcing the unlawful activity and offer reinstatement to the unlawfully terminated employees, making them whole for loss of earnings and financial harm suffered.  

Editor's Note:  The NLRB General Counsel has been advocating this type result, but this is the first NLRB ruling on the subject, although it comes from an administrative law judge rather than the Board itself.  The NLRB issued a press release on this case, suggesting its importance to the Board.  It should be noted that the case was analyzed under the concept of overbroad policies, but an employer will find difficulty drafting more narrow rules to comply with this doctrine.  The full Board will undoubtedly review this case, but the current makeup of the Board seems to support almost any doctrine that favors union organizing. 

This article is part of our August 2024 Newsletter. 

View newsletter online

Download the newsletter as a PDF

Get Email Updates

Receive newsletters and alerts directly in your email inbox. Sign up below.
connected spheres
The U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) announced on April 22, 2026, a new proposed rule clarifying when multiple employers are jointly liable f…
plaintiff sign
The Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) encourages the use and enforcement of arbitration agreements, although the Act contains an exception for…
3
On April 13, 2026, President Trump nominated James Macy to fill the third vacant Republican seat on the National Labor Relations Board (NLR…
deception
An employer official named in a graphic sexual harassment suit brought a counter-claim against her accuser for defamation, calling his alle…
pointing to computer
No personnel issues have been debated longer and more thoroughly than that of the utility of performance reviews.  Some argue that such rev…
electrical strands
This newsletter has written many articles about challenges and questions raised by the use of AI by employers.  The latest comes from a law…