Jury Brings Back a $3 Million Verdict for Failure to Accommodate Remote Work
One of the most common areas of litigation under the Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA) relate to workers who request to work remotely as a reasonable accommodation for some type of disability. While employers appear to be winning a majority of these lawsuits, there are some notable exceptions.
In October, two dispatchers were each awarded $1.5 million in damages for being illegally denied telework arrangements for COVID-19 risks imposed by their disabilities. The claims were brought under the ADA along with the New York State Human Rights Law and the New York City Human Rights Law. The jury awarded each employee $1 million in punitive damages, along with various amounts for backpay and emotional distress. The key issue before the jury was whether in-person attendance was an essential job function of the plaintiffs’ role as dispatchers. Russo v. Nat’l. Grid, U.S.A., No. 1:23-cv-03954 (E.D. N.Y. verdict entered 10/14/25). The jurors found that the employer failed to show how their requests caused undue hardships for the company.
This article is part of our November 2025 Newsletter.
View the newsletter online
Download the newsletter as a PDF
Related Content
Get Email Updates

Navigating the New Legal Minefield of Automated HR

Is an Employer Required to Classify Employees as Exempt?

Can Hostile Environment Plaintiffs Bolster Their Case by Evidence of Hostile Environment Against Other Minorities?

What to Make of EEOC Rescission of Its Harassment Guidance

Asking Team Members What Slows You Down or Makes It Harder to Do Your Job
