Jury Brings Back a $3 Million Verdict for Failure to Accommodate Remote Work
One of the most common areas of litigation under the Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA) relate to workers who request to work remotely as a reasonable accommodation for some type of disability. While employers appear to be winning a majority of these lawsuits, there are some notable exceptions.
In October, two dispatchers were each awarded $1.5 million in damages for being illegally denied telework arrangements for COVID-19 risks imposed by their disabilities. The claims were brought under the ADA along with the New York State Human Rights Law and the New York City Human Rights Law. The jury awarded each employee $1 million in punitive damages, along with various amounts for backpay and emotional distress. The key issue before the jury was whether in-person attendance was an essential job function of the plaintiffs’ role as dispatchers. Russo v. Nat’l. Grid, U.S.A., No. 1:23-cv-03954 (E.D. N.Y. verdict entered 10/14/25). The jurors found that the employer failed to show how their requests caused undue hardships for the company.
This article is part of our November 2025 Newsletter.
View the newsletter online
Download the newsletter as a PDF
Related Content
Get Email Updates

FCRA Litigation Challenges Employers’ Use of AI Hiring Platforms

The Dangers of Employers Using AI Research Tools as to Discovery Requests from Plaintiffs

Two Subsequent Cases Protect Defendant’s Use of AI as Subject to Work-product Protection

Is There Anything an Employer Can Do to Avoid Waiving Privileges in Using AI Research Tools?

Suggestions on Use of AI
