Democrats Lay out Their Agenda at Labor Board

Written on .

In late July, two well-known union attorneys were confirmed by the Senate as members of the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB), David Prouty and Gwynne Wilcox.  Prouty replaces Republican member William Emanuel, whose term expires in late August, and Wilcox will fill a vacant seat, giving the Democrats a 3-2 edge.  Wilcox is best known for suing McDonald's on behalf of the Fight for $15 worker advocacy group.  

Around the same time, Jennifer Abruzzo, another former union attorney, was confirmed as General Counsel of the NLRB, and wasted no time issuing a document called Mandatory Submissions to Advice Memorandum, which lays out a clear agenda for all field offices of the NLRB addressing unfair labor practice charges.  The first section of the memo identifies subject matter areas where she considers Board precedent to have been overruled, and thus wants her office to review.  Those areas are as follows: 

  1. Employer handbook rules - To review handbook rules developed during the Trump Administration and their applicability to confidentiality rules, non-disparagement rules, social media rules, media communication rules, civility rules, respectful and professional manner rules, offensive language rules, and no camera rules.  
  2. Confidentiality provisions - separation agreements and instructions - To address separation agreements that contain confidentiality and non-disparagement clauses as well as those prohibiting the departing employee from participating in claims brought by any third party against the employer in return for severance monies, and also confidentiality rules or instructions given to employees pertaining to workplace investigations.  
  3. What constitutes protected concerted activity - To review cases addressing what rises to the level of concerted activity and what constitutes mutual aid or protection, mentioning a case involving a bathroom conversation as not involving working conditions, and cases involving the applicability of the inherently concerted doctrine, such as issues involving employees' health and safety.  Other priorities in this area including rules governing employees' rights to use an employer's email system as well as use of other electronic platforms in the workplace, and cases distinguishing no-solicitation policies from mere "union talk."  
  4. Wright Line/General Counsel's Burden - To review a variety of theories dealing with the burden of proof in unfair labor practice prosecutions.
  5. Remedial Issues - To review cases involving unfair labor practice settlements where the employer offers significantly more back pay than is owed in return for a waiver of the employee's reinstatement, and other standards for the acceptance of settlement agreements.
  6. Union access - To review cases involving access to a property owner that tries to exclude off-duty contractor employees seeking access to the premises as well as excluding union representatives from access to public spaces on employer property.  
  7. Union Dues - To review cases dealing with the issue of whether the employer may lawfully cease checking off union dues following the expiration of the collective bargaining agreement, as well as cases involving objections to union dues and the type of disclosures necessary that show that lobbying costs were not included. 
  8. Employee status - To review the burden of proof of establishing independent contractor status.  
  9. Employer duty to recognize and/or bargain - To review how broadly management rights clauses in bargaining agreements can be interpreted; circumstances where a successor employer refuses to hire a certain number of the predecessor's workforce to avoid a finding of successorship; whether an employer stating a "competitive disadvantage" to a union in negotiations has to furnish financial records; limiting unlawful implementation of a last and final offer in negotiations; and whether pay or benefit increases are required post-contract expiration, and a number of other listed situations.

The second part of the memorandum sets forth other areas in which Abruzzo would like to carefully examine (and possibly change): 

  • Employee status - To review whether it is an unfair labor practice where an employer has misclassified persons as independent contractors; whether someone not generally interested in seeking employment is nevertheless an employee; a  wide variety of issues pertaining to whether an employee is entitled to representation in a disciplinary interview in both union and non-union situations; whether an employer has engaged in so-called "surface" collective bargaining and thus in bad faith; whether the so-called "contract bar" to union decertifications should extend beyond three years; circumstances of whether an employer can be forced to recognize a union where it presents evidence of a card majority; cases involving the permanent replacement of economic strikers; what constitutes an intermittent strike that is unprotected; legitimacy of statements that employee access to management will be limited to employees who choose a union, and a variety of other issues.

The third section in the memo identifies other case handling matters that should continue to be submitted to her.  Some 16 different areas are listed, including cases involving employer lock-outs; injunctions during the pendency of unfair labor practice charges; cases involving where an employer could be ordered to bargain with the union because of its unfair labor practices; discharges during union organizing drives; first contract bargaining; and settlement agreements.

Editor's Note: President Biden is proud of his position as the "most pro-union President in history."  While the above memo from the new General Counsel only indicates areas in which she intends to "review," the purpose is quite obvious, that she intends to consider changing all those doctrines to a more pro-union position.

This is part of our September 2021 Newsletter.

Click here to download the newsletter PDF

Get Email Updates

Receive newsletters and alerts directly in your email inbox. Sign up below.

Recent Content

hand on window while raining

Update on the COVID ETS: It Has Been Stayed. But for How Long?

As noted in my blog post last week, it was expected that there would be many challenges to the COVID Emergency Temporary Standard (ETS). ...
guys outside working on something

Does Your Company Need to Comply with Vaccine and Safety Protocols Applicable to Federal Contractors?

On September 9, 2021, President Biden signed Executive Order 14042, Ensuring Adequate COVID Safety Protocols for Federal Contractors, whi...
medical supplies on a pink table

The OSHA COVID-19 Vaccination and Testing Emergency Temporary Standard is Here — What You need to Know

The Biden Administration promised us a COVID-19 vaccine mandate, and today it arrived for private employers of 100 or more employees. [Th...
Biden Harris Press Conference

Developments Since Biden's Mandatory Vaccination-Testing Directives

Many developments have occurred since President Biden on September 9, 2021 issued certain announcements and executive orders to require e...
money bills

Employee Wins a $137 Million Jury Verdict in Single Plaintiff Discrimination Case

A Tesla factory worker in California in early October won a $137 million race discrimination verdict. The plaintiff was employed by a tem...
doctor with blue gloves giving person a covid vaccine, indoors

The EEOC Updated Its COVID Vaccination Guidance and Confirmed What We Already Knew About Political Objections to Vaccination

Yesterday, the EEOC updated its Guidance regarding COVID-19, specifically addressing employee religious objections to employer vaccinatio...

Wimberly, Lawson, Steckel, Schneider & Stine

3400 Peachtree Road, Ste 400 / Lenox Towers / Atlanta, GA 30326 /404.365.0900

Where Experience Counts


Thank you for visiting the firm's website. Please note that this website is intended for general information purposes only and does not constitute an offer of representation or create an attorney-client relationship with the firm. The firm welcomes receipt of electronic mail but the act of sending electronic mail alone does not create an attorney-client relationship. You may reproduce materials available at this site for your own personal use and for non-commercial distribution. All copies must include the firm's copyright notice.

© 2020 Wimberly, Lawson, Steckel, Schneider & Stine P.C. | Site By JSM