Accessibility Tools

Skip to main content

The Latest      —

EEOC RULES ON WELLNESS PLANS TAKE EFFECT

Written on .

New EEOC rules allowing employers to offer employees incentives to participate in wellness programs took effect on January 1, 2017.  The AARP had sued to block the rules contending that the rules permit employers to compel employees to surrender private health and genetic information that the ADA and GINA generally protect from involuntary disclosure.  The EEOC rules provide that employers may offer workers up to 30% of the cost of self-only health insurance for participation in wellness programs that include health risk assessments or tests that can divulge disabilities or genetic data.  The rules contemplate that these financial inducements are "incentives" and not penalties against workers who refuse to give out their private health and genetic information.  On December 29, 2016, a federal district court in Washington refused to enjoin the implementation of these rules.  AARP v. EEOC, No. 16-2113 (12/29/16). 

Related Content

Get Email Updates

Receive newsletters and alerts directly in your email inbox. Sign up below.

Recent Content

Restricted Entry
The Trump Administration has acted to terminate TPS status for several countries. Of course, litigation has followed each notice of termina…
sorry we're closed
For years the Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs (OFCCP) was a formidable enforcer of equal employment and affirmative action a…
birthday sign
Readers may be confused about the significance of the U.S. Supreme Court rulings in Trump v. CASA and related cases, as part of the birthri…
woman looking through a telescope
In the last month of the Biden Administration, the EEOC issued a fact sheet on wearable technology under the anti-discrimination laws, “Wea…
cultural celebration
The concept of company culture is important for most employers.  It is important because it actually constitutes an operating system for em…
trans flag
There have been several recent developments concerning transgender rights.  Most interpret the Supreme Court’s 2020 ruling in Bostock v. Cl…